chore: scrub internal-file ref from proto comment

[satyakwok]

Companion to #23 — the generated .ts files were scrubbed there, but src/grpc-proto/sentrix.proto (the source) still had the old comment. Patched to match.

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores
  • Updated internal documentation comment in gRPC protocol definitions.

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 6d140760-e090-4295-b9c0-56d4bb82d7ce

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 45de27f and 9ecbc31.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• src/grpc-proto/sentrix.proto

---

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

This PR updates a single comment line at the top of src/grpc-proto/sentrix.proto. The change replaces a reference to a design doc with a new reference to an internal gRPC service-proto draft design. No protobuf message definitions, service definitions, or RPC signatures are modified.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~1 minute

Possibly related PRs

• Sentriscloud/sdk-ts#23: Updates top-of-file comments in other gRPC-related sources (src/grpc-web/sentrix.ts and src/grpc-web/sentrix.client.ts) without modifying runtime code or definitions.

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Description check	⚠️ Warning	The description is incomplete. While it explains the change and its context, it lacks the required Summary and Test plan sections from the template.	Add a structured Summary (1-3 sentences about what changed and why) and a Test plan section with test cases, following the required template format.

✅ Passed checks (4 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Title check	✅ Passed	The title accurately describes the main change: removing an internal-file reference from a proto file comment, which matches the changeset.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

_{✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.}

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Commit unit tests in branch chore/scrub-proto-comment

---

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}