CI: Remove esvu LibJS REPL jobs
#24679
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
As of devsnek/esvu#57, `esvu` now pulls the LibJS binaries from the Ladybird repo, so these artifacts being created has no purpose. As far as I can tell, nothing else uses them. Maybe if the two LibJS versions start going their separate ways enough to warrant both being available, we could consider re-adding this job. But no point in using up CI resources for that right now.
github-actions
bot
added
the
👀 pr-needs-review
github-actions
bot
removed
the
👀 pr-needs-review
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
As of devsnek/esvu#57,
esvunow pulls the LibJS binaries from the Ladybird repo, so these artifacts being created has no purpose. As far as I can tell, nothing else uses them.Maybe if the two LibJS versions start going their separate ways enough to warrant both being available, we could consider re-adding this job. But no point in using up CI resources for that right now.