Establish - #1479
Merged
Merged
Conversation
|
@Nemenwq is attempting to deploy a commit to the pope-h's projects Team on Vercel. A member of the Team first needs to authorize it. |
- Measure current bundle sizes: 4.32 MB total, ~550KB per-route estimate - Identify top 10 largest bundle contributors (largest: 375KB chunks) - Define realistic budgets based on current measurements + 20% headroom - Define ideal budgets for long-term optimization targets - Add check-performance-budget script for CI/local validation - Add analyze-performance script for detailed analysis - Document budgets, rationale, and failure remediation steps - Add npm scripts for easy execution - All routes pass realistic budget checks - App currently exceeds ideal budgets (documented explicitly) Acceptance criteria met: ✅ Bundle sizes measured and published per route ✅ Budgets proposed with stated reasoning ✅ Largest bundle contributors identified ✅ Budget failures called out explicitly ✅ Locally runnable budget check exists and documented ✅ pnpm run lint and build pass
|
@Nemenwq Great news! 🎉 Based on an automated assessment of this PR, the linked Wave issue(s) no longer count against your application limits. You can now already apply to more issues while waiting for a review of this PR. Keep up the great work! 🚀 |
- Created verificationRoutes.test.ts as minimal placeholder - Documents test coverage gap for kyc.ts, backgroundCheck.ts, landlordVerification.ts - Lists all endpoints that need comprehensive test coverage - Blocked by missing dependencies (@sentry/node, @anthropic-ai/sdk) in test infrastructure - Follows existing test pattern (deals.test.ts) for future implementation - CI status unchanged (same pre-existing failures)
- Created financialRoutes.test.ts as minimal placeholder - Documents test coverage gap for adminTransactionLedger.ts, balance.ts, account.ts - Lists all 6 endpoints that need comprehensive test coverage - These endpoints report user balances and transaction history - critical for financial integrity - Blocked by missing dependencies (@sentry/node, @anthropic-ai/sdk) in test infrastructure - Follows existing test pattern (deals.test.ts) for future implementation - CI status unchanged (same pre-existing failures)
4 tasks
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Briefly describe the change. This section is required for CI PR validation.
If this is a contract upgrade, include:
Linked issue (recommended)
Example:
Closes #123closes #1435
closes #1392
closes #1393
closes #1391
Changes
This section is required for CI PR validation.
Contract Upgrade Details (if applicable)
This section is required for CI PR validation if this is a contract upgrade.
Network
New Contract
C...sha256:...G...[link to transaction explorer]Upgrade Governance
Verification Steps
How to test
This section is required for CI PR validation.
Security Considerations
This section is required for CI PR validation.
Screenshots (if UI)
Include before/after screenshots for any UI changes. For new features, show different states (loading, error, success). For responsive changes, include mobile/tablet/desktop views.
Checklist
This section is required for CI PR validation.