Skip to content

Conversation

lopert
Copy link
Contributor

@lopert lopert commented Aug 28, 2025

Pulling the test command out of the prototype and cleaning it up.

@lopert lopert force-pushed the lopert.wasm-testing-command branch from 90ef620 to a385b75 Compare August 28, 2025 20:08
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Aug 29, 2025

Coverage report

St.
Category Percentage Covered / Total
🟡 Statements
78.4% (-0.09% 🔻)
13543/17275
🟡 Branches
72.52% (+0.07% 🔼)
6589/9086
🟡 Functions
78.62% (-0.17% 🔻)
3520/4477
🟡 Lines
78.75% (-0.1% 🔻)
12804/16260
Show new covered files 🐣
St.
File Statements Branches Functions Lines
🔴
... / test.ts
0% 0% 0% 0%
🔴
... / test-command-runner.ts
51.95% 60.87% 40.91% 51.95%
🔴
... / spin-cache.ts
0% 100% 0% 0%
🟢
... / spin.ts
97.5% 68% 100% 97.44%
Show files with reduced coverage 🔻
St.
File Statements Branches Functions Lines
🟢
... / deploy.ts
96.25% (-1.12% 🔻)
90.48% (-3.64% 🔻)
100%
97.37% (+0.07% 🔼)
🟢
... / id-matching.ts
98.89% (-0.01% 🔻)
92% (-0.86% 🔻)
100%
98.57% (-0.02% 🔻)
🟢
... / otel-metrics.ts
89.74%
70.83% (-3.08% 🔻)
85.71% 89.47%
🟢
... / session.ts
89.6%
77.17% (-0.35% 🔻)
91.67% 88.98%
🟢
... / fqdn.ts
94.55% (-1.01% 🔻)
90.32% (-0.98% 🔻)
100%
94.55% (-1.01% 🔻)

Test suite run success

3243 tests passing in 1359 suites.

Report generated by 🧪jest coverage report action from 310b568

@lopert lopert force-pushed the lopert.wasm-testing-command branch from 9891d72 to 0ebb496 Compare August 29, 2025 12:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant