Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix pylint warning unspecified-encoding #7222

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

RatishT
Copy link

@RatishT RatishT commented Jun 17, 2024

User description

Changes Made:

  • Applied automated fixes for the pylint warning “unspecified-encoding”.
    "It is better to specify an encoding when opening documents. Using the system default implicitly can create problems on other operating systems. See https://peps.python.org/pep-0597/"

Note:

This pull request is part of a research project conducted by researchers from TU Delft, titled "PyWarnFixer: Using ML to Fix Pylint Warnings." The goal of this study is to investigate the perceptions and practices of code quality among developers in Python open-source projects and to develop a tool that uses AI to automatically fix pylint warnings.

Research Study Information:

This pull request is part of a research project. For more information about the study, please visit the project's information page.

Consent to Participate:

If you review this pull request, you are invited to participate in our study. Your participation is voluntary. To provide your consent, just open an issue in our repository with the provided template using the following link: consent issue template .


Thank you for considering participation in our research. Your feedback is crucial and highly valued. If you have any questions or concerns, please contact the Responsible Researcher at [email protected].


PR Type

Bug fix


Description

  • Added encoding='utf-8' to multiple open function calls across various files to fix pylint warning unspecified-encoding.
  • Ensured consistent file encoding to prevent issues across different operating systems.
  • Adjusted logging for file evaluation in builtin.py.

Changes walkthrough 📝

Relevant files
Bug fix
11 files
analyze_reports.py
Specify UTF-8 encoding when opening report files.               

autogpt/agbenchmark_config/analyze_reports.py

  • Added encoding='utf-8' to the open function call.
+1/-1     
__main__.py
Specify UTF-8 encoding for backend output file.                   

benchmark/agbenchmark/main.py

  • Added encoding='utf-8' to the open function call for backend output.
  • +1/-1     
    app.py
    Specify UTF-8 encoding for challenge spec files.                 

    benchmark/agbenchmark/app.py

  • Added encoding='utf-8' to the open function call for reading challenge
    spec files.
  • +2/-1     
    __init__.py
    Specify UTF-8 encoding for data files in challenges.         

    benchmark/agbenchmark/challenges/init.py

  • Added encoding='utf-8' to the open function call for reading data
    files.
  • +1/-1     
    builtin.py
    Specify UTF-8 encoding for optional categories file and adjust
    logging.

    benchmark/agbenchmark/challenges/builtin.py

  • Added encoding='utf-8' to the open function call for optional
    categories file.
  • Adjusted logging for file evaluation.
  • +21/-21 
    json_to_base_64.py
    Specify UTF-8 encoding for secrets.json file.                       

    benchmark/reports/json_to_base_64.py

  • Added encoding='utf-8' to the open function call for secrets.json.
  • +1/-1     
    match_records.py
    Specify UTF-8 encoding for report files.                                 

    benchmark/reports/match_records.py

  • Added encoding='utf-8' to the open function call for report files.
  • +2/-2     
    send_to_googledrive.py
    Specify UTF-8 encoding for report.json file.                         

    benchmark/reports/send_to_googledrive.py

  • Added encoding='utf-8' to the open function call for report.json.
  • +1/-1     
    cli.py
    Specify UTF-8 encoding for data.json files in CLI.             

    cli.py

  • Added encoding='utf-8' to the open function call for data.json files.
  • +3/-3     
    local.py
    Specify UTF-8 encoding for file storage operations.           

    forge/forge/file_storage/local.py

  • Added encoding='utf-8' to the open function call in file storage.
  • +1/-1     
    openai.py
    Specify UTF-8 encoding for loading Azure configuration.   

    forge/forge/llm/providers/openai.py

  • Added encoding='utf-8' to the open function call for loading Azure
    config.
  • +1/-1     

    💡 PR-Agent usage:
    Comment /help on the PR to get a list of all available PR-Agent tools and their descriptions

    @RatishT RatishT requested a review from a team as a code owner June 17, 2024 17:07
    @RatishT RatishT requested review from Bentlybro and aarushik93 and removed request for a team June 17, 2024 17:07
    Copy link

    PR Description updated to latest commit (c4f4cbe)

    Copy link

    PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

    ⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5] 2
    🧪 Relevant tests No
    🔒 Security concerns No
    ⚡ Key issues to review Consistency in File Handling:
    The PR consistently adds 'encoding="utf-8"' to file open operations, which is good for ensuring consistent behavior across different environments. However, it's important to ensure that all file operations across the project follow this pattern to avoid similar issues in other parts of the codebase.

    Copy link

    netlify bot commented Jun 17, 2024

    Deploy Preview for auto-gpt-docs canceled.

    Name Link
    🔨 Latest commit 00ff4d0
    🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/auto-gpt-docs/deploys/667f01cc4ecd5300085ed250

    Copy link

    PR Code Suggestions ✨

    CategorySuggestion                                                                                                                                    Score
    Possible bug
    Use f.read() instead of f.read_text() to read the content of the file

    The read_text method is used on a Path object, not a file object. To read the content of
    the file, use f.read() instead.

    benchmark/agbenchmark/app.py [59-60]

     with open(challenge_spec_file, 'r', encoding='utf-8') as f:
    -    logger.debug(f"Invalid challenge spec: {f.read_text()}")
    +    logger.debug(f"Invalid challenge spec: {f.read()}")
     
    • Apply this suggestion
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 10

    Why: The suggestion correctly identifies and fixes a critical bug where f.read_text() is incorrectly used instead of f.read(), which would cause an AttributeError since read_text is not a method of file objects.

    10
    Best practice
    Ensure sys.stdout is restored after redirecting it to a file

    To ensure that the original sys.stdout is restored after the with block, store the
    original sys.stdout before reassigning it and restore it in a finally block.

    benchmark/agbenchmark/main.py [146-149]

    -with open("backend/backend_stdout.txt", "w", encoding="utf-8") as f:
    -    sys.stdout = f
    -    exit_code = run_benchmark(
    -        config=agbenchmark_config,
    +original_stdout = sys.stdout
    +try:
    +    with open("backend/backend_stdout.txt", "w", encoding="utf-8") as f:
    +        sys.stdout = f
    +        exit_code = run_benchmark(
    +            config=agbenchmark_config,
    +finally:
    +    sys.stdout = original_stdout
     
    • Apply this suggestion
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8

    Why: This suggestion improves the robustness of the code by ensuring that sys.stdout is restored after being redirected, which is a best practice to avoid side effects in other parts of the application.

    8

    Copy link

    codecov bot commented Jun 17, 2024

    Codecov Report

    Attention: Patch coverage is 6.66667% with 14 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

    Project coverage is 33.73%. Comparing base (f2cb553) to head (c4f4cbe).
    Report is 37 commits behind head on master.

    Current head c4f4cbe differs from pull request most recent head 00ff4d0

    Please upload reports for the commit 00ff4d0 to get more accurate results.

    Files Patch % Lines
    benchmark/agbenchmark/challenges/builtin.py 9.09% 10 Missing ⚠️
    benchmark/agbenchmark/app.py 0.00% 2 Missing ⚠️
    benchmark/agbenchmark/__main__.py 0.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
    benchmark/agbenchmark/challenges/__init__.py 0.00% 1 Missing ⚠️

    ❗ There is a different number of reports uploaded between BASE (f2cb553) and HEAD (c4f4cbe). Click for more details.

    HEAD has 20 uploads less than BASE
    Flag BASE (f2cb553) HEAD (c4f4cbe)
    macOS 6 0
    agbenchmark 4 2
    Linux 3 1
    forge 4 0
    autogpt-agent 4 0
    Windows 3 1
    Additional details and impacted files
    @@            Coverage Diff             @@
    ##           master    #7222      +/-   ##
    ==========================================
    - Coverage   39.97%   33.73%   -6.25%     
    ==========================================
      Files         103       22      -81     
      Lines        6601     1894    -4707     
      Branches      979      331     -648     
    ==========================================
    - Hits         2639      639    -2000     
    + Misses       3855     1241    -2614     
    + Partials      107       14      -93     
    Flag Coverage Δ
    Linux 33.73% <6.66%> (-6.25%) ⬇️
    Windows 45.70% <8.33%> (+2.47%) ⬆️
    agbenchmark 33.73% <6.66%> (-0.02%) ⬇️
    autogpt-agent ?
    forge ?
    macOS ?

    Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

    ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
    📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

    @ntindle
    Copy link
    Member

    ntindle commented Jun 18, 2024

    Fails linting

    @kcze
    Copy link
    Contributor

    kcze commented Jun 18, 2024

    Fails tests because tries to pass encoding when reading in binary mode.

    @RatishT
    Copy link
    Author

    RatishT commented Jun 28, 2024

    Fails tests because tries to pass encoding when reading in binary mode.

    Thank you for your help, I have made adjustments to resolve that issue

    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
    Projects
    Status: 🆕 Needs initial review
    Development

    Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

    None yet

    3 participants