-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Master code v5 #256
base: master-code-v5
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Master code v5 #256
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hey @jammesop007aha - I've reviewed your changes and they look great!
Here's what I looked at during the review
- 🟡 General issues: 15 issues found
- 🟢 Security: all looks good
- 🟡 Testing: 7 issues found
- 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment to tell me if it was helpful.
@@ -112,206 +122,3 @@ def add_qb_torrent(link, path, listener, ratio, seed_time): | |||
remove(link) | |||
client.auth_log_out() | |||
|
|||
def __remove_torrent(client, hash_): |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
suggestion (code_refinement): Consider handling exceptions in __remove_torrent
function.
The function __remove_torrent
performs operations that might fail, such as file deletions. It's good practice to handle potential exceptions to avoid crashing the application.
def __remove_torrent(client, hash_): | |
def __remove_torrent(client, hash_): | |
try: | |
client.torrents_delete(torrent_hashes=hash_, delete_files=True) | |
except Exception as e: | |
print(f"Failed to remove torrent {hash_}: {e}") | |
with qb_download_lock: |
from bot import LOGGER, download_dict, download_dict_lock, config_dict, \ | ||
user_data, OWNER_ID, non_queued_dl, non_queued_up, queued_dl, queue_dict_lock | ||
from bot.helper.telegram_helper.message_utils import sendMessage, sendStatusMessage, sendStatusMessage, sendFile | ||
import os |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
suggestion (code_refinement): Consider removing redundant import.
The 'os' module is imported twice in the same file, consider removing the redundant import to clean up the code.
self.__size = 0 | ||
self.error = None | ||
self.gid = "" | ||
super(MegaAppListener, self).__init__() | ||
super().__init__() |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
suggestion (code_clarification): Use explicit superclass for clarity.
Using super(MegaAppListener, self).__init__()
would increase clarity by explicitly stating the superclass.
super().__init__() | |
super(MegaAppListener, self).__init__() |
self.continue_event.clear() | ||
function(*args) | ||
asyncio.run(function(*args)) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
issue (bug_risk): Potential issue with running asyncio function directly.
Directly running an asyncio function using asyncio.run
inside a presumably synchronous method could lead to event loop issues. Consider ensuring that the event loop handling is appropriate for your application's architecture.
executor.do(folder_api.loginToFolder, (mega_link,)) | ||
node = folder_api.authorizeNode(mega_listener.node) | ||
except Exception as e: | ||
LOGGER.error(e) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
suggestion (code_refinement): Add more context to the logging statement.
Consider adding more context to the logging statement to help with debugging, such as the function or scenario in which the error occurred.
LOGGER.error(e) | |
LOGGER.error(f"Error in mega_downloader: {e}") |
@@ -100,7 +128,9 @@ def onTransferFinish(self, api: MegaApi, transfer: MegaTransfer, error): | |||
except Exception as e: | |||
LOGGER.error(e) | |||
|
|||
def onTransferTemporaryError(self, api, transfer, error): | |||
def onTransferTemporaryError( | |||
self, api, transfer, error: MegaError |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
suggestion (testing): Specify types for all parameters
For consistency and improved type checking, consider specifying the types for all parameters in the method signature.
self, api, transfer, error: MegaError | |
def onTransferTemporaryError( | |
self, api: MegaApi, transfer: MegaTransfer, error: MegaError | |
) -> None: |
executor.do(folder_api.loginToFolder, (mega_link,)) | ||
node = folder_api.authorizeNode(mega_listener.node) | ||
except Exception as e: | ||
LOGGER.error(e) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
suggestion (testing): Add more descriptive error logging
Consider adding more context to the error logging within the except
block to help with debugging. For example, log the function or conditions that were being processed when the error occurred.
LOGGER.error(e) | |
LOGGER.error(f"Error occurred in mega_downloader during login or authorization: {e}") |
ZIP_UNZIP_LIMIT = config_dict['ZIP_UNZIP_LIMIT'] | ||
LEECH_LIMIT = config_dict['LEECH_LIMIT'] | ||
STORAGE_THRESHOLD = config_dict['STORAGE_THRESHOLD'] | ||
DAILY_MIRROR_LIMIT = config_dict['DAILY_MIRROR_LIMIT'] * 1024**3 if config_dict['DAILY_MIRROR_LIMIT'] else config_dict['DAILY_MIRROR_LIMIT'] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
issue (testing): Consider handling potential division by zero
When config_dict['DAILY_MIRROR_LIMIT']
is zero, this line will lead to a division by zero error in the multiplication. It's safer to add a check or use a default non-zero value.
user_id_not_owner = user_id != OWNER_ID | ||
user_not_sudo = not is_sudo(user_id) | ||
user_not_paid = not is_paid(user_id) | ||
if any(limits) and user_id_not_owner and user_not_sudo and user_not_paid: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
suggestion (testing): Add test to verify behavior when user limits are exceeded
Ensure there is a test case that checks the system's response when user limits are exceeded, including the correct error messages and no download initiation.
if any(limits) and user_id_not_owner and user_not_sudo and user_not_paid: | |
if any(limits): | |
if user_id_not_owner and user_not_sudo and user_not_paid: | |
raise Exception("Download limits exceeded. Access denied.") |
try: | ||
drive.download(link) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
suggestion (testing): Test exception handling during download
Include a test to ensure that the exception handling block during the file download process works as expected, particularly that it logs the error and returns the correct error message.
try: | |
drive.download(link) | |
try: | |
drive.download(link) | |
except Exception as e: | |
logging.error(f"Failed to download: {str(e)}") | |
return {"status": "error", "message": str(e)} |
wayback_handler = CommandHandler( | ||
BotCommands.WayBackCommand, | ||
wayback, | ||
filters=authfilter | Filters.user(config_dict["OWNER_ID"]), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ℹ️ Codacy found a minor Code Style issue: undefined name 'config_dict' (F821)
The issue identified by Prospector is that the name config_dict
is undefined within the scope where it's being used. This means that config_dict
has not been declared or imported in the current scope, so Python doesn't know what config_dict
refers to when it's trying to access config_dict["WAYBACK_ENABLED"]
and config_dict["OWNER_ID"]
.
To fix this issue, you need to ensure that config_dict
is defined before this line of code is executed. This typically involves importing config_dict
from another module where it is defined or declaring it within the same file before it is used.
Assuming config_dict
is supposed to be a global variable or is defined in a settings module or similar, you would need to import it or declare it. Here's a hypothetical fix where config_dict
is imported from a module named settings
:
filters=authfilter | Filters.user(config_dict["OWNER_ID"]), | |
from settings import config_dict |
This comment was generated by an experimental AI tool.
for stream in fields: | ||
if stream.get('codec_type') == 'video': | ||
is_video = True | ||
elif stream.get('codec_type') == 'audio': | ||
is_audio = True | ||
return is_video, is_audio | ||
|
||
if __name__ == "__main__": |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ℹ️ Codacy found a minor Code Style issue: expected 2 blank lines after class or function definition, found 1 (E305)
The issue identified by Prospector and the associated E305 error code from PEP 8 guidelines indicate that there should be two blank lines before the if __name__ == "__main__":
block, but only one blank line is found in the provided code snippet. This is a style issue that pertains to the readability and consistency of the code.
Here is the suggested single line change to fix the issue:
if __name__ == "__main__": |
You should add this blank line before the if __name__ == "__main__":
line to adhere to PEP 8 standards.
This comment was generated by an experimental AI tool.
import os | ||
import sys | ||
import shutil | ||
import subprocess |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The security issue associated with the subprocess
module arises from the potential risk of shell injection attacks when user input is passed unsafely to a subprocess call. For example, using subprocess
with shell=True
can be dangerous if the command string is constructed from unsanitized user input. This can allow an attacker to execute arbitrary commands on the system.
To mitigate this risk, it's important to use the subprocess
module in a way that avoids shell injection. This typically involves avoiding the use of shell=True
and instead using a list of arguments for the command and its parameters, which the subprocess
module will execute without invoking the shell.
Here is a single line change suggestion that doesn't alter the import statement but provides a guideline on how to safely use the subprocess
module:
import subprocess | |
# Always use subprocess with a list of arguments and avoid shell=True to prevent security issues. |
It's important to note that simply changing the import statement won't fix the security issue; the actual calls to subprocess functions such as subprocess.run()
or subprocess.Popen()
need to be reviewed and potentially refactored to ensure they're used safely throughout the codebase. The suggestion above serves as a comment reminder for safe usage practices.
This comment was generated by an experimental AI tool.
@@ -8,6 +8,9 @@ | |||
from re import search as re_search | |||
from threading import Lock, Thread | |||
|
|||
import logging | |||
from typing import Any, Dict, List, Optional, Set, Union |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The issue identified by Pylint is that the List
type from the typing
module has been imported but is not being used anywhere in the code. This is considered a code style issue because having unused imports can make the code less readable and slightly increase the memory footprint of the program.
To fix the issue, you should remove the List
import from the typing
module. Here's the suggested change:
from typing import Any, Dict, List, Optional, Set, Union | |
from typing import Any, Dict, Optional, Set, Union |
This comment was generated by an experimental AI tool.
from telegram.error import RetryAfter | ||
from telegram.ext import CommandHandler, Filters, MessageHandler, Updater | ||
from telegram.helpers import mention_html | ||
from telegram.utils.helpers import escape_markdown |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The issue indicated by Pylint is that the escape_markdown
function is imported from telegram.utils.helpers
but it is not used anywhere in the code. This is a common problem when refactoring or changing code; sometimes imports are left in the code even though they are no longer needed. This can clutter the codebase and make it less readable.
To resolve this issue, you should remove the unused import. Here's the suggested change:
from telegram.utils.helpers import escape_markdown | |
# from telegram.utils.helpers import escape_markdown |
This comment was generated by an experimental AI tool.
@@ -220,29 +287,39 @@ def update_all_messages(force=False): | |||
with status_reply_dict_lock: | |||
for chat_id in status_reply_dict: | |||
if status_reply_dict[chat_id] and msg != status_reply_dict[chat_id][0].text: | |||
if config_dict['PICS']: | |||
rmsg = editPhoto(msg, status_reply_dict[chat_id][0], choice(config_dict['PICS']), buttons) | |||
if config_dict["PICS"]: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ℹ️ Codacy found a minor Code Style issue: undefined name 'config_dict' (F821)
The issue identified by the Prospector linter is that the variable config_dict
is being used in the conditional statement, but it has not been defined within the scope of the code fragment provided. This means that the code will raise a NameError
when it tries to access config_dict
if it is not defined elsewhere in the code outside of the provided snippet.
To fix this issue, we need to ensure that config_dict
is defined before it is used. This could involve passing config_dict
as an argument to the function containing this code fragment, defining it within the function, or ensuring it is available in the global scope if appropriate for the context. Since the provided code fragment does not include the function signature, I will assume that adding config_dict
as a parameter to the function is the appropriate solution.
Here is the suggested single line change to the function signature (assuming this code is inside a function):
if config_dict["PICS"]: | |
def function_name(status_reply_dict, status_reply_dict_lock, config_dict): # Replace 'function_name' with the actual function name |
Please note that you would need to replace function_name
with the actual name of the function and ensure that config_dict
is passed as an argument wherever this function is called.
This comment was generated by an experimental AI tool.
@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@ | |||
from telegram.ext import CommandHandler | |||
from typing import Union |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ℹ️ Codacy found a minor Code Style issue: 'typing.Union' imported but unused (F401)
The issue identified by Prospector is that the Union
type from the typing
module has been imported but is not used anywhere in the code fragment you've provided. This is considered a code style issue because it's generally good practice to avoid importing modules or objects that aren't being used, as they can create unnecessary dependencies and can make the code less readable and maintainable.
To fix this issue, you should remove the unused import from the code. Here's the suggested change:
from typing import Union | |
# Removed the unused import 'Union' |
This comment was generated by an experimental AI tool.
LOGGER.info(f"User : {user_id} Daily Mirror Size : {get_readable_file_size(msize)}") | ||
|
||
if daily_leech_limit and listener.is_leech and user_id != OWNER_ID and not is_sudo(user_id) and not is_paid(user_id) and (size >= (daily_leech_limit - getdailytasks(user_id, check_leech=True)) or daily_leech_limit <= getdailytasks(user_id, check_leech=True)): | ||
mssg = f'Daily Leech Limit is {get_readable_file_size(daily_leech_limit)}\nYou have exhausted all your Daily Leech Limit or File Size of your Leech is greater than your free Limits.\nTRY AGAIN TOMORROW' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ℹ️ Codacy found a minor Code Style issue: line too long (210 > 159 characters) (E501)
The issue identified by the Prospector linter is that the line of code exceeds the maximum allowed length. The PEP 8 style guide recommends that lines should not exceed 79 characters in length for better code readability, but some projects extend this limit to 99, 119, or, in this case, 159 characters. The line in question is 210 characters long, which makes it harder to read, especially on smaller screens or when viewing side-by-side diffs in version control systems.
To fix this issue, we can split the long string into multiple lines using parentheses to enclose the string literals. This will allow us to adhere to the line length limit without affecting the string's content. Here's the code suggestion:
mssg = (f'Daily Leech Limit is {get_readable_file_size(daily_leech_limit)}\n'
'You have exhausted all your Daily Leech Limit or File Size of your '
'Leech is greater than your free Limits.\nTRY AGAIN TOMORROW')
This comment was generated by an experimental AI tool.
from urllib3 import disable_warnings | ||
import base64 | ||
import re | ||
import json |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The issue that Pylint has identified is that the json
module is imported but not used anywhere in the provided code fragment. Having unused imports can lead to unnecessary clutter in the code, making it less readable and potentially causing confusion about the code's dependencies. Additionally, it can slightly increase memory usage and startup time.
To fix this issue, you should remove the unused import. Here is the suggestion:
import json | |
# Removed the unused import statement |
This comment was generated by an experimental AI tool.
if "{" in longurl or "}" in longurl: | ||
raise TypeError | ||
|
||
unquoted_longurl = unquote(longurl).encode('ascii') |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The issue that Pylint has identified is that the variable unquoted_longurl
is assigned a value but then never used in the subsequent code. This is considered a code style issue because it's generally a good practice to avoid defining variables that are not used, as it can lead to confusion and clutter in the codebase.
To fix this issue, you should either use the unquoted_longurl
variable in a meaningful way or remove the line that creates it. Since there is no context in the provided code fragment that suggests how unquoted_longurl
should be used, the simplest fix is to remove the line.
Here's the code suggestion to fix the issue:
unquoted_longurl = unquote(longurl).encode('ascii') | |
# Removed the unused variable assignment |
This comment was generated by an experimental AI tool.
import mega | ||
from mega import MegaApi, MegaError, MegaRequest, MegaTransfer | ||
from telegram import Message, Bot, Update | ||
from telegram.error import TelegramError |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ℹ️ Codacy found a minor Code Style issue: 'telegram.error.TelegramError' imported but unused (F401)
The issue identified by the Prospector linter is that the TelegramError
class is imported from the telegram.error
module, but it is not used anywhere in the code fragment provided. This is considered a Code Style issue because importing unused modules or classes can lead to unnecessary clutter in the code, making it harder to read and maintain. Additionally, it can potentially increase the memory footprint of the program.
To fix this issue, you should remove the unused import statement. If TelegramError
is not used anywhere in the rest of the code, the line importing it should be deleted.
Here's the code suggestion to fix the issue:
from telegram.error import TelegramError | |
# Remove the unused import statement |
This comment was generated by an experimental AI tool.
"Opera/9.80 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.3) Presto/2.2.15 Version/10.10", | ||
"Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 10; SM-G975F) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/81.0.4044.117 Mobile Safari/537.36" | ||
] | ||
return random.choice(agents) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The issue identified by the Bandit linter is that the random.choice
function uses a pseudorandom number generator that is not cryptographically secure. This means that the values it produces are not truly random and could potentially be predicted, which might be a concern if the values are used in a security-sensitive context.
To fix this issue, you should use a cryptographically secure random number generator. In Python, you can use the secrets
module which is designed for generating cryptographically strong random numbers suitable for managing data such as passwords, account authentication, security tokens, and related secrets.
Here's the code suggestion to replace random.choice
with secrets.choice
:
return random.choice(agents) | |
return secrets.choice(agents) |
This comment was generated by an experimental AI tool.
try: | ||
result = check_output(["ffprobe", "-hide_banner", "-loglevel", "error", "-print_format", | ||
"json", "-show_format", "-show_streams", path]).decode('utf-8') | ||
result = subprocess.check_output( |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The issue identified by Bandit is that the subprocess.check_output
function is potentially executing untrusted input, which can lead to security vulnerabilities such as shell injection attacks if the input to the subprocess is not properly sanitized or comes from an untrusted source.
In the provided code, the path
variable is being directly converted to a string and passed to subprocess.check_output
. If path
contains any shell metacharacters or is constructed from user input, it could be used to execute arbitrary commands.
To mitigate this risk, you should ensure that subprocess.check_output
is called with shell=False
(which is the default behavior) and that the arguments are passed as a list of strings to avoid shell interpretation. This is already the case in the provided code fragment, but it's good to be explicit. Moreover, it's important to validate or sanitize all external input to ensure that it does not contain unexpected characters.
However, since Bandit still flagged the line, it's possible that Bandit is not recognizing that the input has been sanitized or is expecting a different approach. One way to possibly satisfy Bandit (assuming the input is already safe) is to explicitly pass the arguments as a list, which is already being done. If Bandit is still flagging the issue, you could consider using a more secure alternative like shlex.quote
to ensure that the input is safe for shell commands, although this is generally more applicable when shell=True
.
Since the code is already using shell=False
by default and passing the arguments as a list, the issue might be a false positive from Bandit. However, for completeness, here's how you would use shlex.quote
:
result = subprocess.check_output(
["ffprobe", "-hide_banner", "-loglevel", "error", "-print_format", "json", "-show_format", "-show_streams", shlex.quote(str(path))],
stderr=subprocess.STDOUT
).decode('utf-8')
Please note that in the context of this code, using shlex.quote
is redundant since the arguments are already passed as a list to subprocess.check_output
, which prevents shell injection. The suggestion is provided to demonstrate how you would use shlex.quote
if it were necessary. If Bandit continues to flag this as an issue, it might be a false positive, and you should review the specific circumstances under which path
is set to ensure it's always a trusted input.
This comment was generated by an experimental AI tool.
from os import remove | ||
from typing import Any, Callable, Coroutine, Optional |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ℹ️ Codacy found a minor Code Style issue: 'typing.Any' imported but unused (F401)
The issue identified by the Prospector linter is that the Any
type from the typing
module has been imported but is not being used anywhere in the code. This is a common issue where imports are added for use during development, but the actual use of the import is removed or refactored away, leaving the import statement unnecessary. Unused imports can clutter the code and may lead to confusion or unnecessary dependencies.
To fix this issue, you should remove the unused Any
import from the typing
module. Here is the suggested change:
from typing import Any, Callable, Coroutine, Optional | |
from typing import Callable, Coroutine, Optional |
This comment was generated by an experimental AI tool.
if __name__ == "__main__": |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ℹ️ Codacy found a minor Code Style issue: expected 2 blank lines after class or function definition, found 1 (E305)
The issue identified by the Prospector linter is that the PEP 8 style guide specifies that there should be two blank lines before a top-level if __name__ == "__main__":
block, following the definition of classes or functions in the same file. In the provided code fragment, there is only one blank line before the if __name__ == "__main__":
line, which is why Prospector is flagging it as a Code Style issue (E305).
To fix this issue, you simply need to add an additional blank line before the if __name__ == "__main__":
line. Here is the suggested change:
if __name__ == "__main__":
main()
This comment was generated by an experimental AI tool.
'StartCommand': get_command(f'START_COMMAND', f'start{CMD_SUFFIX}'), | ||
'MirrorCommand': get_command(f'MIRROR_COMMAND', f'mirror{CMD_SUFFIX}'), | ||
'UnzipMirrorCommand': get_command(f'UNZIP_COMMAND', f'unzipmirror{CMD_SUFFIX}'), | ||
'ZipMirrorCommand': get_command(f'ZIP_COMMAND', f'zipmirror{CMD_SUFFIX}'), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ℹ️ Codacy found a minor Code Style issue: f-string is missing placeholders (F541)
The issue identified by Prospector with the code f'zipmirror{CMD_SUFFIX}'
is that it's using an f-string (formatted string literal) but there are no placeholders within the curly braces that require formatting. This is unnecessary and can be simplified to a regular string since there's no variable or expression to be evaluated and inserted into the string.
Here's the suggested change to fix the issue:
'ZipMirrorCommand': get_command(f'ZIP_COMMAND', f'zipmirror{CMD_SUFFIX}'), | |
'ZipMirrorCommand': get_command('ZIP_COMMAND', 'zipmirror' + CMD_SUFFIX), |
This comment was generated by an experimental AI tool.
buttons.sbutton('All', f"torser {user_id} all plugin") | ||
buttons.sbutton("Cancel", f"torser {user_id} cancel") | ||
return buttons.build_menu(2) | ||
def __plugin_buttons(user_id: int) -> str: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ℹ️ Codacy found a minor Code Style issue: expected an indented block (E112)
The issue identified by the Prospector linter is that it expects an indented block of code following the function definition def __plugin_buttons(user_id: int) -> str:
. This typically means that the function definition is followed by a colon :
, but the code block that should be the body of the function is missing or not properly indented.
Since the actual body of the function is not provided in the code fragment you've given, I will provide a placeholder indented block to demonstrate how you would correct the indentation issue. In practice, you would replace the pass
with the actual implementation of the function.
Here's the corrected line with a proper indented block:
def __plugin_buttons(user_id: int) -> str: | |
pass # Replace with actual function body |
By adding an indented pass
statement, we satisfy the linter's requirement for an indented block following the function definition. Remember to replace pass
with the actual code that should be in the function's body.
This comment was generated by an experimental AI tool.
self.__corrupted = 0 | ||
self.__resource_lock = RLock() | ||
self.__resource_lock = threading.RLock() |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ℹ️ Codacy found a minor Code Style issue: undefined name 'threading' (F821)
The issue indicated by Prospector's F821 error is that the name 'threading' has been used without being imported or defined in the current scope. The Python interpreter does not know what 'threading' refers to since it hasn't been introduced in the code.
To fix this issue, you need to import the 'threading' module at the beginning of your Python file, so that the 'threading' name is defined and the RLock
class can be used properly.
Here is the single line code suggestion to fix the issue:
self.__resource_lock = threading.RLock() | |
import threading |
This comment was generated by an experimental AI tool.
with status_reply_dict_lock: | ||
if not status_reply_dict or not Interval or (not force and time() - list(status_reply_dict.values())[0][1] < 3): | ||
if not status_reply_dict or ( |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ℹ️ Codacy found a minor Code Style issue: undefined name 'status_reply_dict' (F821)
The issue that Prospector is reporting indicates that the name status_reply_dict
is not defined in the scope where it's being used. This could happen if the dictionary status_reply_dict
is not declared at the module level or within the same scope as the update_all_messages
function.
However, given that this is a fragment of code and it seems like status_reply_dict
is intended to be a global variable (since it's being accessed without being passed as an argument to the functions), it is likely that the variable is indeed defined elsewhere in the code. If that's the case, the linter might be reporting a false positive because it cannot see the full context in which status_reply_dict
is defined.
Assuming status_reply_dict
is intended to be a global variable and is defined at the module level, you can explicitly declare it as global inside the function to resolve the linter warning. Here's the single line change to add at the beginning of the update_all_messages
function:
if not status_reply_dict or ( | |
global status_reply_dict |
This line should be added right inside the update_all_messages
function, before attempting to access status_reply_dict
. This will inform the function that status_reply_dict
is a global variable and should not be treated as an undefined local variable.
This comment was generated by an experimental AI tool.
from telegram.ext import CallbackContext | ||
from telegram.ext.handler import CommandHandler | ||
from telegram.ext.dispatcher import Dispatcher | ||
from telegram.utils.helpers import mention_html |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The issue identified by Pylint is that the mention_html
function is imported from telegram.utils.helpers
, but it is not being used anywhere in the provided code fragment. Having unused imports can clutter the codebase, make it harder to understand, and can potentially lead to conflicts or unexpected behaviors if there are name clashes.
To fix this issue, you should remove the unused import statement. Here's the suggested change:
from telegram.utils.helpers import mention_html | |
# The unused import 'mention_html' is removed from the imports list |
This comment was generated by an experimental AI tool.
|
||
|
||
class TorNode(NodeMixin): | ||
def __init__(self, name, is_folder=False, is_file=False, parent=None, size=None, priority=None, file_id=None, progress=None): | ||
def __init__(self, name: str, is_folder: bool = False, is_file: bool = False, parent: Optional['TorNode'] = None, size: Optional[int] = None, priority: Optional[int] = None, file_id: Optional[str] = None, progress: Optional[float] = None): |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ℹ️ Codacy found a minor Code Style issue: line too long (243 > 159 characters) (E501)
The issue identified by the Prospector linter is that the line of code exceeds the maximum recommended length, making it less readable and harder to maintain. The PEP 8 style guide recommends that lines should not exceed 79 characters, but some teams extend this limit to 120 or slightly more for practical reasons. In this case, the linter is configured with a maximum line length of 159 characters, and the line in question is 243 characters long.
To fix this issue, we can break the line into multiple lines, which is a common practice for improving readability. Here's a suggestion to split the constructor definition into multiple lines:
def __init__(
self, name: str, is_folder: bool = False, is_file: bool = False,
parent: Optional['TorNode'] = None, size: Optional[int] = None,
priority: Optional[int] = None, file_id: Optional[str] = None,
progress: Optional[float] = None
):
This comment was generated by an experimental AI tool.
from typing import Optional | ||
|
||
import requests | ||
from telegram import Message, Bot, User, ParseMode |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ℹ️ Codacy found a minor Code Style issue: 'telegram.Bot' imported but unused (F401)
The issue here is that the Bot
class is imported from the telegram
module but it is not used anywhere in the code fragment provided. This is considered a code style issue because it goes against the PEP 8 recommendation of avoiding unnecessary imports, which can lead to confusion and a less readable codebase.
To fix this issue, we should remove the Bot
class from the import statement. Here's the suggested change:
from telegram import Message, Bot, User, ParseMode | |
from telegram import Message, User, ParseMode |
This comment was generated by an experimental AI tool.
import telegram | ||
from pyrogram import Client as PyrogramClient | ||
from pyrogram.errors import FloodWait | ||
from telegram import ParseMode, Update |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The issue identified by Pylint is that the Update
class from the telegram
module is imported but not used anywhere in the code fragment provided. This is a common issue when a developer imports a class or function with the intention of using it, but then the code evolves and the import remains, becoming unnecessary and potentially confusing for others reading the code.
To fix this issue, you should remove the unused Update
import from the telegram
module. Here is the suggested line change:
from telegram import ParseMode, Update | |
from telegram import ParseMode |
This comment was generated by an experimental AI tool.
sleep(config_dict['AUTO_DELETE_UPLOAD_MESSAGE_DURATION']) | ||
elif config_dict["AUTO_DELETE_UPLOAD_MESSAGE_DURATION"] != -1: | ||
await asyncio.sleep( | ||
config_dict["AUTO_DELETE_UPLOAD_MESSAGE_DURATION"] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ℹ️ Codacy found a minor Code Style issue: undefined name 'config_dict' (F821)
The issue identified by the Prospector linter is that the variable config_dict
is not defined within the scope of the auto_delete_upload_message
function. This means that when the function tries to access config_dict["AUTO_DELETE_UPLOAD_MESSAGE_DURATION"]
, it will raise a NameError
because config_dict
is not known in the current local or global namespace.
To fix this issue, you would need to ensure that config_dict
is defined before it is used, or passed into the function as a parameter. Assuming config_dict
is intended to be a global variable that contains configuration settings, you would need to declare it as global inside the function, or better yet, pass it as a parameter to avoid relying on global state.
Here's a code suggestion to pass config_dict
as a parameter to the function:
async def auto_delete_upload_message(
bot: telegram.Bot,
config_dict: dict,
cmd_message: Optional[telegram.Message] = None,
bot_message: Optional[telegram.Message] = None,
) -> None:
This comment was generated by an experimental AI tool.
from time import time, sleep | ||
import os | ||
import time | ||
from typing import Dict, List, Optional, Union |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ℹ️ Codacy found a minor Code Style issue: 'typing.Union' imported but unused (F401)
The issue identified by Prospector's linter is that the Union
type from the typing
module has been imported but is not being used anywhere in the code. This is considered a code style issue because it goes against the principle of importing only what is necessary, which helps to keep the code clean and reduces memory usage.
To fix this issue, we should remove the Union
import from the typing
module. Here's the single line change that addresses this:
from typing import Dict, List, Optional, Union | |
from typing import Dict, List, Optional |
This comment was generated by an experimental AI tool.
No description provided.