Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Mirror: Adds "untriaged" labeler workflow #363

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from
Closed

Mirror: Adds "untriaged" labeler workflow #363

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

SimpleStation14
Copy link
Member

Mirror of PR #26392: Adds "untriaged" labeler workflow from space-wizards space-wizards/space-station-14

0303e9cb36902007354e9a5ed9fbc147c9ebe70f

PR opened by PJB3005 at 2024-03-24 17:17:08 UTC

PR changed 1 files with 13 additions and 0 deletions.

The PR had the following labels:

  • No C#

Original Body

All new opened issues automatically get marked as "untriaged", so a maintainer can go through them properly.

@SimpleStation14 SimpleStation14 added the Pull Request Mirror Mirrors a PR from another Repo. Automatically applied by mirror bot label May 3, 2024
@DangerRevolution DangerRevolution requested review from VMSolidus, DEATHB4DEFEAT and a team May 11, 2024 01:35
@github-actions github-actions bot added the Status: Needs Review Someone please review this label May 11, 2024
@DangerRevolution DangerRevolution added Priority: 4-Low Should be resolved at some point Changes: Workflow Changes any GitHub workflow files Size: 5-Very Small For especially small issues/PRs Type: Codebase An issue with the codebase labels May 11, 2024
@DangerRevolution DangerRevolution marked this pull request as ready for review May 11, 2024 01:35
@FoxxoTrystan
Copy link
Contributor

Not gona approved anything as this is not my thing!
good luck!

@DEATHB4DEFEAT
Copy link
Member

What is the benefit of this? We have Status: Needs Review and other metadata.

@DangerRevolution
Copy link
Contributor

What is the benefit of this? We have Status: Needs Review and other metadata.

I think this autolabels every PR with this, (which should be the case for "Needs Review" too)

@stellar-novas
Copy link
Contributor

This is for issues, not PRs. It's for maintainers to easily find which issues haven't been looked at/claimed by a dev.

@DEATHB4DEFEAT
Copy link
Member

DEATHB4DEFEAT commented May 14, 2024 •
edited
Loading

This is for issues, not PRs. It's for maintainers to easily find which issues haven't been looked at/claimed by a dev.

Add the needs review label to issues ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Pspritechologist
Pspritechologist requested changes May 14, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@Pspritechologist Pspritechologist left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Name seems unclear to me. If the intention is for 'unclaimed' Issues, why not simply use 'Unclaimed?'
I will say that it seems like a useful distinction to 'Needs Review.' You'd filter by the two for very different reasons

@DEATHB4DEFEAT
Copy link
Member

If the intention is for 'unclaimed' Issues, why not simply use 'Unclaimed?'

image

Mnemotechnician pushed a commit to Mnemotechnician/Einstein-Engines that referenced this pull request Dec 15, 2024
@Fansana
Merge pull request Simple-Station#363 from Fansana/pipeline-update
4bcdb78 
Pipeline Updates
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@Pspritechologist Pspritechologist Pspritechologist requested changes

@VMSolidus VMSolidus VMSolidus approved these changes

@DEATHB4DEFEAT DEATHB4DEFEAT Awaiting requested review from DEATHB4DEFEAT DEATHB4DEFEAT is a code owner

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
Changes: Workflow Changes any GitHub workflow files Priority: 4-Low Should be resolved at some point Pull Request Mirror Mirrors a PR from another Repo. Automatically applied by mirror bot Size: 5-Very Small For especially small issues/PRs Status: Needs Review Someone please review this Type: Codebase An issue with the codebase
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
7 participants
@SimpleStation14 @FoxxoTrystan @DEATHB4DEFEAT @DangerRevolution @stellar-novas @VMSolidus @Pspritechologist