…correct_spikearray_waring

fixed the check for early spikes

…extract_iobuf_during_run

remove extract_iobuf_during_run flag

There's apparently also a crash, but I can't reproduce that locally

…doc-fix

Documentation fix

…send_sync_repeat

allow for mutliple send_sync

…doc-fix

Trying to fix a crash...

add the reel error function

change real error function for an erzate

write some comments

Do an approxiamtion of 2 over sqrt(pi)
in order to remove the error due to the sqrtk() function.
Start to remove division in the threshold_func().

	modified:   meanfield/models/meanfield_model_impl.h
Set threshold_func() add and remove r_squared() because don't implemented yet.
No removing of division yet.

…optimisation yet

	modified:   ../../spynnaker/pyNN/models/neuron/builds/meanfield_base.py
	modified:   ../../spynnaker/pyNN/models/neuron/implementations/meanfield_impl_standard.py
	modified:   ../../spynnaker/pyNN/models/neuron/neuron_models/config.py
	modified:   ../../spynnaker/pyNN/models/neuron/neuron_models/meanfield_model_eitn.py

ADD Vi and put it like state_variables
CHANGE muV from state_variables to parameters

	modified:   ../../spynnaker/pyNN/models/neuron/builds/meanfield_base.py
	modified:   ../../spynnaker/pyNN/models/neuron/implementations/meanfield_impl_standard.py
	modified:   ../../spynnaker/pyNN/models/neuron/neuron_models/config.py

pbl when add Vi obtain DIBBY0 error but now clue where.

	modified:   meanfield/models/meanfield_model_impl.c
	modified:   meanfield/models/meanfield_model_impl.h
	modified:   ../../spynnaker/pyNN/models/neuron/builds/meanfield_base.py
	modified:   ../../spynnaker/pyNN/models/neuron/implementations/meanfield_impl_standard.py
	modified:   ../../spynnaker/pyNN/models/neuron/neuron_models/meanfield_model_eitn.py

try to solved the error DIVBY0 and pass from 10 vars recorded to 5.

	modified:   ../../src/meanfield/models/meanfield_model_impl.c
	modified:   ../../../spynnaker/pyNN/models/neuron/implementations/meanfield_impl_standard.py
	modified:   ../../../spynnaker/pyNN/models/neuron/neuron_models/meanfield_model_eitn.py
	modified:   ../../../spynnaker8/extra_models/__init__.py

OK problem don't comming from printing data but I guess from creating them.
I will change some C code in meanfield_impl_standard.h
PBL is like if Ve and g_syn are ok to be create but not Vi and Fout_th for a
 5 vars recorded

Need to add Vi really to tyhe implementation and so to meanfield_model_impl.h
and .c and to meanfield_model.h
so if need comme back here

	modified:   ../../src/meanfield/models/meanfield_model.h
	modified:   ../../src/meanfield/models/meanfield_model_impl.c

Ok that working a priori, it's not the most beautiful but it's working
Just one comment is : the numbers between Ve and Vi are not treat as the same,
	don't understadn why??

	modified:   src/meanfield/models/meanfield_model.h
	modified:   src/meanfield/models/meanfield_model_impl.c

a priori that's work for Ve, Vi and Fout_th
->will add an other TF() and so an other threshold_function() in order to have
	a MF

before add config Vi

	modified:   config.h
	modified:   meanfield_model.h
	modified:   meanfield_model_impl.c

Add in the c code the inhibitory contribution of the MF and so the
 differenciation btw Exc and Inh.
Names of some variables and params will be change in order to don't induce
misunderstanding.

	modified:   Makefile
	modified:   ../../../src/meanfield/implementations/meanfield_impl_standard.h
	renamed:    ../../../src/meanfield/models/Vthre_params.h -> ../../../src/meanfield/models/P_fit_polynomial.h
	modified:   ../../../src/meanfield/models/meanfield_model.h
	modified:   ../../../src/meanfield/models/meanfield_model_impl.c
	modified:   ../../../../spynnaker/pyNN/models/neuron/abstract_pynn_meanfield_model_standard.py
	modified:   ../../../../spynnaker/pyNN/models/neuron/builds/meanfield_base.py

Add the other transfert function for inhibitors in C code,
-> take parameters from config.h to an other Opaque structure P_fit_polynomial.h
that's compile

	modified:   Makefile
	modified:   ../../../src/meanfield/implementations/meanfield_impl_standard.h
	modified:   ../../../src/meanfield/models/meanfield_model.h
	modified:   ../../../src/meanfield/models/meanfield_model_impl.c
	renamed:    ../../../src/meanfield/models/config.h -> ../../../src/meanfield/models/params_from_network.h

renames config.h to params_from_network.h in order to be more precise in the
correspondance btw code and litterature.
change names of types, arrays and structure.
compilation is ok

	modified:   ../../../src/meanfield/models/params_from_network.h

was changeing mathsbox.h for estimate_err_func.h but go back bcs I don't
know if I will implement other function inside mathsbox and not just error
function

wasn't go back totaly

	modified:   builds/meanfield_base.py
	modified:   implementations/meanfield_impl_standard.py
	renamed:    neuron_models/config.py -> neuron_models/params_from_network.py

change name config.py for params_from_network.py and so in files

	modified:   builds/meanfield_base.py
	new file:   neuron_models/p_fit_polynomial.py
	modified:   neuron_models/params_from_network.py

add an other struct file to implemente params from fit of single neuron for
Vthre polynome

…dard.h

	modified:   ../../../src/meanfield/models/params_from_network.h
	modified:   ../../../../spynnaker/pyNN/models/neuron/builds/meanfield_base.py
	modified:   ../../../../spynnaker/pyNN/models/neuron/implementations/meanfield_impl_standard.py
	modified:   ../../../../spynnaker/pyNN/models/neuron/neuron_models/__init__.py
	modified:   ../../../../spynnaker/pyNN/models/neuron/neuron_models/p_fit_polynomial.py
	modified:   ../../../../spynnaker/pyNN/models/neuron/neuron_models/params_from_network.py

A priori meanfield_model_cond.dict says that I'm out of DTCM.
	That's why I get the error:
	"Population meanfield_model_cond does not have parameter p0"
Go back to the past commit without inh implemented, just to see.

…base.py

	modified:   ../../../../spynnaker/pyNN/models/neuron/implementations/meanfield_impl_standard.py
	renamed:    ../../../../spynnaker/pyNN/models/neuron/neuron_models/p_fit_polynomial.py -> ../../../../spynnaker/pyNN/models/neuron/neuron_models/P_fit_polynomial_exc.py
	new file:   ../../../../spynnaker/pyNN/models/neuron/neuron_models/P_fit_polynomial_inh.py
	modified:   ../../../../spynnaker/pyNN/models/neuron/neuron_models/__init__.py

CHECK POINT
That's compile and work in virtual mode for c and python.
ERROR : DIVBY0 when reel mode

	modified:   ../../../../spynnaker/pyNN/models/neuron/builds/meanfield_base.py

DIVBY0 error is solved, due to put state var in local but don't go back to
struct so all the time 0.
RESUME :
	- TF for exc and inh with
	- some name changed in the files and in variables
WILL:
	- Change MeanfieldModelEitn in python
	- add adaptation W ODE
	- change Fout_th for W in output

	modified:   __init__.py
	renamed:    meanfield_model_eitn.py -> meanfield_of_adex_network.py

Change the name from meanfield_model_eitn.py to meanfield_of_adex_network.py

…dard.h

	modified:   ../../../src/meanfield/models/meanfield_model_impl.c
	modified:   ../../../src/meanfield/models/meanfield_model_impl.h
	modified:   ../../../../spynnaker/pyNN/models/neuron/builds/meanfield_base.py
	modified:   ../../../../spynnaker/pyNN/models/neuron/implementations/meanfield_impl_standard.py
	modified:   ../../../../spynnaker/pyNN/models/neuron/neuron_models/meanfield_of_adex_network.py

Add the structure for adaptation W, that's work but give non-sense results.
Need to add a start value and the real ODE.

	modified:   ../../../../spynnaker/pyNN/models/neuron/builds/meanfield_base.py
	modified:   ../../../../spynnaker/pyNN/models/neuron/neuron_models/meanfield_of_adex_network.py

Correct some error but have an error when calculating EDO with RK2_midpoint.
maybe "error" come from recorder.py and constant.py
will do some test so if need come back here

	modified:   ../../../src/meanfield/models/meanfield_model_impl.h
	modified:   ../../../../spynnaker/pyNN/models/neuron/builds/meanfield_base.py
	modified:   ../../../../spynnaker/pyNN/models/neuron/implementations/meanfield_impl_standard.py
	modified:   ../../../../spynnaker/pyNN/models/neuron/neuron_models/meanfield_of_adex_network.py
	modified:   ../../../../spynnaker/pyNN/models/recorder.py
	modified:   ../../../../spynnaker/pyNN/utilities/constants.py

do some modification aparently without effect of
recorder and constant in rder to integrate Ve, Vi and W.
Will modify meanfield_t
because Vthre left in it but not anymore in meanfield_t and so modif
 meanfield_f_adex_network.py

	modified:   ../../../../spynnaker/pyNN/models/neuron/builds/meanfield_base.py
	modified:   ../../../../spynnaker/pyNN/models/neuron/neuron_models/meanfield_of_adex_network.py

remove nbr from meanfielf_t and to meanfield_of_adex_network.py

	modified:   ../../../../spynnaker/pyNN/models/neuron/builds/meanfield_base.py
	modified:   ../../../../spynnaker/pyNN/models/neuron/neuron_models/meanfield_of_adex_network.py

No clue of why w return uint32 DataType and not S1615.
Will try in switching Vi and w

…dard.h

	modified:   ../../../src/meanfield/models/meanfield_model.h
	modified:   ../../../src/meanfield/models/meanfield_model_impl.c
	modified:   ../../../../spynnaker/pyNN/models/neuron/neuron_models/meanfield_of_adex_network.py

SAVE POINT
	now that's fonctionnaly work.
	NEED to optimise or doing real ode solver and error_function

	modified:   ../../../src/meanfield/models/meanfield_model_impl.c

modified error_function with midpoint methode for integration.
will do pregressively trapezoidale and Simpson if possible in ITCM
BUT try to have an homogeneous patern i.e. EULER and Midpoint integrale
for error function.

	modified:   ../../../../spynnaker/pyNN/models/neuron/builds/meanfield_base.py
Did some cleanning, correction and rewriting of euler, RK2, mu_Ge and modif TvN= Tv only because of the original paper.
Need to ask for that!!
Modif T_inv in value.
need to find a way to plot but plt.show don't work on the terminal.

	modified:   ../../../src/meanfield/models/meanfield_model_impl.c
	modified:   ../../../../spynnaker/pyNN/models/neuron/builds/meanfield_base.py

Do some clarification and try some method to remove the 'overflowed ITCM' message
because of sqrtk
sqrt function is not activated, so sV is on the square value.
Need to find a solution for sqrt without overflowed ITCM

too much changes, so will have too much conflict to fixe so merge with -s ours

…ld_model into meanfield_model

try to merge origin_MF with this local branch with -s ours option in order to remove conflict