Merged
Conversation
Author
|
Check failing seems unrelated to the PR, and more about byond not existing on the building machine? |
We can testmerge just to be on the safe side. |
DerFlammenwerfer
approved these changes
Sep 6, 2025
DerFlammenwerfer
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It all looks pretty good. Testmerge will follow.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
About The Pull Request
I've had a lot of ideas about expanding the cleric patron spell selection, and adding patron-specific subclasses.
I started a long while ago, forgot about it for like 3 months, and did what I could in the last couple of days.
Everything currently written is tested, but any ideas for the remaining to-dos/placeholders/bad fashion are welcome.
This all is probably going to go poof when the rebase hits anyways.