Boosted http-client code coverage to 100% + minor updates

[thehenrytsai]

• Boosted http-client to have 100% code coverage
• Removed seemingly unnecessary explicit calls of setPrototypeOf()
• Added html reporter for code coverage for local detailed report

[changeset-bot]

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: ee0cc18

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

[github-actions]

TBDocs Report

🛑 Errors: 0
⚠️ Warnings: 3

@tbdex/protocol

• Project entry file: packages/protocol/src/main.ts

@tbdex/http-client

• Project entry file: packages/http-client/src/main.ts

@tbdex/http-server

• Project entry file: packages/http-server/src/main.ts

📄 File: packages/http-server/src/http-server.ts
⚠️ extractor:ae-unresolved-link: The @link reference could not be resolved: The package "@tbdex/http-server" does not have an export "InMemoryOfferingsApi" #L49
⚠️ extractor:ae-unresolved-link: The @link reference could not be resolved: The package "@tbdex/http-server" does not have an export "InMemoryExchangesApi" #L49
⚠️ extractor:ae-unresolved-link: The @link reference could not be resolved: The package "@tbdex/http-server" does not have an export "InMemoryBalancesApi" #L49

---

TBDocs Report Updated at 2024-04-05T04:06:17Z ee0cc18

[jiyoontbd]

maybe what would make more sense naming wise is to say aliceRfq1 and aliceRfq2, since the GET /exchanges call would be returning all exchanges for a given did? so maybe something like

Suggested change

	const bob = await DidJwk.create()
	const bobRfq = await DevTools.createRfq({ sender: bob })
	await bobRfq.sign(bob)
	const aliceRfq2 = await DevTools.createRfq({ sender: alice })
	await aliceRfq2.sign(alice)

[thehenrytsai]

Done. Thanks @jiyoontbd for the knowledge, makes sense, didn't realize the did property was meant to be for the caller, I've updated that too, let me know if I misunderstood again!

[jiyoontbd]

Suggested change

	const aliceRfq = await DevTools.createRfq({ sender: alice })
	await aliceRfq.sign(alice)
	const aliceRfq1 = await DevTools.createRfq({ sender: alice })
	await aliceRfq1.sign(alice)

[thehenrytsai]

Done.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Merging #234 (ee0cc18) into main (9a91ef8) will increase coverage by 0.84%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #234      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   93.92%   94.77%   +0.84%     
==========================================
  Files          42       42              
  Lines        3590     3541      -49     
  Branches      402      390      -12     
==========================================
- Hits         3372     3356      -16     
+ Misses        218      185      -33     

Components	Coverage Δ
protocol	94.90% <ø> (ø)
http-client	100.00% <100.00%> (+4.72%)	⬆️
http-server	91.07% <ø> (+0.19%)	⬆️