Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

trying out this dep checker #88

Closed
wants to merge 5 commits into from
Closed

trying out this dep checker #88

wants to merge 5 commits into from

Conversation

michaelneale
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 2, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #88 (e39a0d0) into main (319eca3) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main      #88   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   85.64%   85.64%           
=======================================
  Files          19       19           
  Lines         432      432           
  Branches       41       41           
=======================================
  Hits          370      370           
  Misses         40       40           
  Partials       22       22           
Components Coverage Δ
protocol 86.73% <ø> (ø)
httpclient 83.33% <ø> (ø)

@ALRubinger
Copy link
Contributor

I proposed Scorecard in #90 - would replace this license checking

@jiyoontbd
Copy link
Contributor

@michaelneale in light of this comment above by alr, should we close this PR?

@ALRubinger
Copy link
Contributor

@michaelneale in light of this comment above by alr, should we close this PR?

That comment is actually a little outdated @jiyoontbd - we've been trying stuff out, as you can see from Mic here too. @leordev should have the latest set of Actions we can put in place for license checking; it's FOSSA. @leordev, got the PR for that for tbdex-kt yet?

@phoebe-lew phoebe-lew closed this Feb 5, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants