Hier connect with test #6413
Hier connect with test #6413
Conversation
Signed-off-by: andyfox-rushc <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: andyfox-rushc <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: andyfox-rushc <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: andyfox-rushc <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: andyfox-rushc <[email protected]>
…mode Signed-off-by: andyfox-rushc <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: andyfox-rushc <[email protected]>
![github-actions[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/15368?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
Signed-off-by: andyfox-rushc <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: andyfox-rushc <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: andyfox-rushc <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: andyfox-rushc <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: andyfox-rushc <[email protected]>
|
clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍" |
…m on modnet Signed-off-by: andyfox-rushc <[email protected]>
|
clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍" |
Signed-off-by: andyfox-rushc <[email protected]>
|
clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍" |
Signed-off-by: andyfox-rushc <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: andyfox-rushc <[email protected]>
|
clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍" |
|
Hi, @andyfox-rushc. Thanks for your contribution to the work on hierarchy support in ODB. It seems like some performance issue with hierarchical ODB when I try before, i.e., very slow on large hierarchical designs. So, I wanna know if there is any more update for ODB hierarchical or if it's already a stable version to use. Very thanks for your reply! |
|
Hi, Joy, thank you for the interest in the hierarchy project. Yes, you are quite right, it is very much a work in progress. If possible please could you send me ([email protected]) or attach to this thread, a sample large case for me to try and I will endeavour to clean up the performance. I am currently working through cts and then once we have gcd going through the whole flow will iterate to improve. Thanks again, andy. |
|
Hi, Joy, thank you for the interest in the hierarchy project. Yes, you are quite right, it is very much a work in progress. If possible please could you send me ***@***.*** ***@***.***) or attach to this thread, a sample large case for me to try and I will endeavour to clean up the performance. I am currently working through cts and then once we have gcd going through the whole flow will iterate to improve. Thanks again, andy.
… On 01/14/2025 6:08 PM PST Joy ***@***.***> wrote:
Hi, @andyfox-rushc https://github.com/andyfox-rushc. Thanks for your contribution to the work on hierarchy support in ODB. It seems like some performance issue with hierarchical ODB when I try before, i.e., very slow on large hierarchical designs. So, I wanna know if there is any more update for ODB hierarchical or if it's already a stable version to use. Very thanks for your reply!
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub #6413 (comment), or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AHRTF7QXWLFYXRXTTZCBMHL2KW7JFAVCNFSM6AAAAABUB4D6RGVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDKOJRGQ4DINJYG4.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: ***@***.***>
|
This pull request includes a C++ test case which builds a multiple level hierarchical design and exercises the creation of a hierarchical connection. This involved adding a cpp directory to the dbSta/test area. The main contribution of this pull request is a c++ level creation of a hierarchical test case.
Also included is a bug fix to the construction of the hierarchy extraction (getParentHierarchy) code which was causing a seg fault.
Ready for review.