Skip to content

ci: support building grt in sweeps #204

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 17, 2024
Merged

ci: support building grt in sweeps #204

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 17, 2024

Conversation

oharboe
Copy link
Collaborator

@oharboe oharboe commented Nov 17, 2024

@jeffng-or FYI, add a sweep_parallel filegroup to build stuff in parallel and then afterwards build grt in serial

add a sweep_parallel filegroup to build stuff in parallel and
then afterwards build grt in serial

Signed-off-by: Øyvind Harboe <[email protected]>
@oharboe
Copy link
Collaborator Author

oharboe commented Nov 17, 2024

@jeffng-or @vvbandeira FYI, CI failures after build completed successfully.

@oharboe oharboe merged commit ec8491e into main Nov 17, 2024
2 of 3 checks passed
@oharboe oharboe deleted the grt-sweep-support branch November 17, 2024 20:12
@vvbandeira
Copy link
Member

@oharboe
The error is in the report generation. It is complaining about GRT-0116 error message which is that the stage finished with congestion. Should we ignore this message as well as GRT-0119 (congestion too high)?

@oharboe
Copy link
Collaborator Author

oharboe commented Nov 18, 2024

@oharboe
The error is in the report generation. It is complaining about GRT-0116 error message which is that the stage finished with congestion. Should we ignore this message as well as GRT-0119 (congestion too high)?

Keep it simple: dont process the logs at all. A nonzero exit code is a failure, a zero exit code is not.

BTW, There is no point in archiving anything as far as my usecase for megaboom CI, I only use bazel artifacts.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants