Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

issue #10837 Move fib_recursive_term() outside of fib_recursive() for proper doctest coverage and improved code organization. #11301

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

MannCode
Copy link
Contributor

issue #10837

Describe your change:

Move fib_recursive_term() outside of fib_recursive() for proper doctest coverage and improved code organization.

  • Add an algorithm?
  • [-] Fix a bug or typo in an existing algorithm?
  • Add or change doctests? -- Note: Please avoid changing both code and tests in a single pull request.
  • Documentation change?

Checklist:

  • [- ] I have read CONTRIBUTING.md.
  • [- ] This pull request is all my own work -- I have not plagiarized.
  • [- ] I know that pull requests will not be merged if they fail the automated tests.
  • [- ] This PR only changes one algorithm file. To ease review, please open separate PRs for separate algorithms.
  • [- ] All new Python files are placed inside an existing directory.
  • [- ] All filenames are in all lowercase characters with no spaces or dashes.
  • [- ] All functions and variable names follow Python naming conventions.
  • [- ] All function parameters and return values are annotated with Python type hints.
  • [- ] All functions have doctests that pass the automated testing.
  • [- ] All new algorithms include at least one URL that points to Wikipedia or another similar explanation.
  • [- ] If this pull request resolves one or more open issues then the description above includes the issue number(s) with a closing keyword: "Fixes #ISSUE-NUMBER".

MannCode and others added 2 commits February 24, 2024 22:12
…cursive() for proper doctest coverage and improved code organization.
@algorithms-keeper algorithms-keeper bot added the tests are failing Do not merge until tests pass label Feb 25, 2024
Comment on lines +86 to +101
def fib_recursive_term(i: int) -> int:
"""
Calculates the i-th (0-indexed) Fibonacci number using recursion
>>> fib_recursive_term(0)
0
>>> fib_recursive_term(1)
1
>>> fib_recursive_term(5)
5
>>> fib_recursive_term(10)
55
>>> fib_recursive_term(-1)
Traceback (most recent call last):
...
Exception: n is negative
"""
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can we:

  1. Removed the large block of empty lines in the middle of the fib_recursive function.
  2. Ensured the docstring for the fib_recursive function is correctly formatted and includes the expected outputs for the doctests.

@MannCode MannCode closed this Jun 16, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
tests are failing Do not merge until tests pass
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants