Skip to content

ci: revert to macos-latest (no self-hosted runner; public repo = free minutes) - #173

Merged
TobiasLaross merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
ci/revert-to-hosted
Jul 6, 2026
Merged

ci: revert to macos-latest (no self-hosted runner; public repo = free minutes)#173
TobiasLaross merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
ci/revert-to-hosted

Conversation

@TobiasLaross

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Reverts the runner move from #172. That change set runs-on: [self-hosted, macOS, arm64], but no self-hosted runner is registered to this repo — personal-account runners are per-repository, and IntelliNest never had one — so jobs queued indefinitely (the post-merge main run sat queued 15+ min and was cancelled).

This repo is public, so GitHub-hosted macos-latest minutes are free (never counted against the 2000-min quota). There was no cost to avoid here, and hosted runners also keep untrusted fork-PR code off our Macs.

Change

  • runs-on: [self-hosted, macOS, arm64]macos-latest

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

…inutes are free

The previous change moved build-and-test to [self-hosted, macOS, arm64], but no
self-hosted runner is registered to this repo (personal-account runners are
per-repo), so every job queued forever. This repo is also public, so hosted
macOS minutes are free and never counted against the Actions quota — there was
no cost to avoid here. Running on GitHub-hosted macOS also keeps untrusted
fork-PR code off our Macs.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0186zQv24n1sdmu7jRfi2s7M
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jul 6, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Warning

Review limit reached

@TobiasLaross, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in: 13 minutes

Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.
You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 5cd6a98f-26bf-4fa8-a059-2308dab0595f

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 314b82f and d169e02.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/ci.yml
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch ci/revert-to-hosted

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@TobiasLaross
TobiasLaross merged commit 2b45b96 into main Jul 6, 2026
1 of 2 checks passed
@TobiasLaross
TobiasLaross deleted the ci/revert-to-hosted branch July 6, 2026 14:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant