Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Subtape + Fix Recursion #171
base: subtape
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Subtape + Fix Recursion #171
Changes from 5 commits
789c1b3
e3f1903
51944bc
ffc5805
171ef24
8f00b12
d2edc3b
2ef618a
8aec918
65923d8
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
IIUC
continuation=true
is now needed because we might be calling the sameTapedFunction
multiple times?EDIT: In contrast to before when were just constructing a new one every time.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think your understanding is correct.
In the tape, a function call constitutes a single instruction.
Previous to my changes, this function call was only allowed to call
produce(val)
once.I think the reason was that without subtapes, we were only able to continue the execution after the call instruction.
This was safe to do if we only allow one
produce
and throw an error otherwise.By flagging a function
g
as non-primitiveis_primitive(typeof(g),...) = false
, we tell Libtask that we want to be able to interrupt the execution ing
(e.g. atproduce(4)
).For this to work any parent tape function
f
(the caller) has to actually own the subtape ofg
.The instruction
counter
ofg
has to be preserved, such that withcontinuation=true
we continue exactly at the correct instruction ing
. And yes,g
is called multiple times with an updatedcounter
.Thus, when we fork/copy a task, we also have to copy all subtapes with their counters.
Also, when reusing a cached tape we have to reset all the counters of the subtapes
counter = 1
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That makes sense; thank you! And again, great work:)