[Build] main <- develop 배포

[euuunchae]

#️⃣연관된 이슈

ex) #이슈번호, #이슈번호

📝작업 내용

이번 PR에서 작업한 내용을 간략히 설명해주세요(이미지 첨부 가능)

스크린샷 (선택)

💬리뷰 요구사항(선택)

리뷰어가 특별히 봐주었으면 하는 부분이 있다면 작성해주세요

ex) 메서드 XXX의 이름을 더 잘 짓고 싶은데 혹시 좋은 명칭이 있을까요?

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores
  • Updated internal dependency reference with no functional impact to user-facing features.

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

---

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

A submodule reference for URISIK_BACKEND_PRIVATE was updated from commit 17d5674 to bf67c3c, representing a forward advancement of the pinned commit. No functional code modifications are present in this change.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
Submodule Reference URISIK_BACKEND_PRIVATE	Updated submodule commit pointer from 17d5674cac4bdb71a6e5a1f6cf0146695dee1c45 to bf67c3cf53ce9ef360e862817834a46f0e135524.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Possibly related PRs

• [Chore] #12 git submodule 설정 #13: Updates the URISIK_BACKEND_PRIVATE submodule reference commit pointer.
• main <- dev 배포 #159: Previously advanced the same submodule reference, establishing the baseline commit for this update.

Suggested labels

🧹chore

Poem

🐰 A submodule hops along the path,
From one commit to the next with glee,
No code was changed, just pointers play,
Keeping references tidy, don't you see!
thump-thump goes the rabbit's approval. ✨

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 2 | ❌ 1

❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Title check	❓ Inconclusive	The pull request title '[Build] main <- develop 배포' uses a deployment-focused prefix but the actual change is merely a submodule reference update with no functional code changes, making the title overly broad and not specific to the actual change.	The title suggests a full deployment build process, but the changeset only contains a submodule version bump. Consider using a more specific title like 'Update URISIK_BACKEND_PRIVATE submodule reference' to accurately reflect the minimal nature of the actual change.

✅ Passed checks (2 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

_{✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.}

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment
• Commit unit tests in branch develop

Tip

Issue Planner is now in beta. Read the docs and try it out! Share your feedback on Discord.

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}