Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix mixed use of ft^\ast and ft^n in struct.get/set execution #402

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 20, 2023

Conversation

tlively
Copy link
Member

@tlively tlively commented Jul 19, 2023

Consistently use \X{ft}^n to refer to the struct field types in the execution
rules for struct.get and struct.set.

Fixes #400.

Consistently use `\X{ft}^n` to refer to the struct field types in the execution
rules for struct.get and struct.set.

Fixes #400.
@tlively tlively requested a review from rossberg July 19, 2023 20:50
@tlively
Copy link
Member Author

tlively commented Jul 19, 2023

Current dependencies on/for this PR:

This comment was auto-generated by Graphite.

Copy link
Member

@rossberg rossberg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

Copy link
Member

@rossberg rossberg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

@rossberg rossberg merged commit 2aad58a into main Jul 20, 2023
3 checks passed
@rossberg rossberg deleted the fix-mixed-ast-n branch July 20, 2023 06:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Inconsistent use of \X{ft}^n and \X{ft}^\ast in execution spec?
2 participants