Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Added some more words #11

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Added some more words #11

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
6064a64
Added Not implemented, Contractor, System administrator
voltrue2 Nov 24, 2016
700c847
Changed System Administrator to System administrator to match the style
voltrue2 Nov 24, 2016
7a919f2
Engineer = PG also means Programmer = PG
voltrue2 Nov 24, 2016
e5998ad
fixed typeof implemebted -> implemented
voltrue2 Nov 25, 2016
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
6 changes: 6 additions & 0 deletions ReadMe.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -90,9 +90,13 @@ English | Japanese | Kana | Notes
--------|----------|------|------
Development | 開発 | かいはつ |
Developer | 開発者 | かいはつしゃ |
Programmer | PG/エンジニア | エンジニア |
Engineer | PG | ぷろぐらまー |
Copy link
Collaborator

@ronkorving ronkorving Nov 29, 2016 •
edited
Loading

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

These two words seem very debatable. Would love some extra feedback on this from either @AlmirKadric or @endow. At the same time I would argue against the differentiation in English between Developer/Programmer/Engineer (keep in mind also that engineer has a much broader meaning than "software engineer").

The translations here are also directly opposite to the English (programmer -> エンジニア and engineer -> ぷろぐらまー) which seems very confusing. Maybe it's correct, but then I wanna be extra rigorous in confirming this is really correct, and commonly used.

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

"Engineer"("エンジニア") designs the system architecture of the program while "Programmer"("プログラマー") doesn't do that. "プログラマー" is just person who has programming language skill.
But sometimes blur the line between them in Japanese.

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Wait it seems the japanese word for these 2 got mixed up. Read the original comment above (it was the first one). This should have been:

Anyways, I can separate them like so:

| Programmer | PG | プログラマー |
| Engineer | PG/エンジニア | エンジニア |

Let me know what you think of it.

@voltrue2 typo?

Copy link
Collaborator

@ronkorving ronkorving Nov 29, 2016 •
edited
Loading

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

On top of your comments, @AlmirKadric, I can add that after discussing with @endowt, "PG" is not a good fit for "Engineer". Because "Programmer" really has 2 Japanese words here, I would prefer 2 distinct entries for them, so the result being:

Programmer | PG | |
Programmer | プログラマー | |
Engineer | エンジニア | |

Development department | 開発部 | かいはつぶ |
Research and development, R&D | 開発研究 | けんきゅうかいはつ
Implementation | 実装 | じっそう |
Not implemented | 未実装 | みじっそう |
Not implemented (Should have been implemented) | 実装漏れ | じっそうもれ |
Design | 設計 | せっけい | Of code, infrastructure and systems, etc.
Feature | 機能 | きのう |
Execution | 実行 | じっこう | Of a function or program
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -166,6 +170,7 @@ Front-end | フロントエンド | |
Management | 管理 | かんり | Of people, software, etc
Manager | 管理者 | かんりしゃ |
Infrastructure | インフラ | |
System administrator | インフラ |
Copy link
Collaborator

@AlmirKadric AlmirKadric Nov 24, 2016 •
edited
Loading

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Typo?
Though this one I have heard a few different variations and not sure which is the most preferred:
システムアドミン (my preference atm)
システム管理者
サーバ管理者
サーバアドミン
サーバオペレータ

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

From my experience with Japanese companies, the term "インフラ" is used for both Infrastructure and Sysadmins.

I just thought that adding this might help others with the confusion of using the same word "インフラ".
Maybe add some comments to this?

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Oh never heard that use before. I see why you structured it the way you did. let me double check with another source first before I get back to you on this one

Copy link
Collaborator

@AlmirKadric AlmirKadric Nov 25, 2016 •
edited
Loading

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

After checking this with a few sources, it seems that this is not incorrect, but not a super popular term currently. The currently trending term apparently is "シスアド". However the other truth is that "インフラ" was popular at one point making this a very much an issue of eras.

As such this word should be listed and at some point we should list the alternatives with possible notes as to which era they belong to (e.g. as of 2015). Though that is not required for this PR.

LGMT 👍

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Awesome



### Business
Expand All @@ -180,4 +185,5 @@ Your company | 御社 | おんしゃ |
Office | 事務所 | じむしょ |
In-house | 社内 | しゃない |
External / 3rd party | 外部 | がいぶ |
Contractor | 外注先 | がいちゅうさき |
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

外注先 is more in the context of a company you contract
however if we're talking about an individual (公人的に) the more correct term would be I think 契約社員. Also if we're talking about an individual who is coming to your office from a contracted company (外注先) then the more correct term to describe that person would be 派遣.

Copy link
Author

@voltrue2 voltrue2 Nov 24, 2016 •
edited
Loading

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

"外注" is specifically used for contractors as in outsourced, so we cannot use "契約社員" or "派遣". This is usually used in B2B situation by the way.

Copy link
Collaborator

@AlmirKadric AlmirKadric Nov 25, 2016 •
edited
Loading

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Double checked this with a few sources LGTM 👍
勉強になりました、ありがとうございます
For clarification, in case anyone might read this, "契約社員" is similar to a full time employee in terms of benefits (insurances, pension etc), however their employment contract is conditional (time period etc). However "外注" is specifically someone you have contracted from the outside (outsourced) to do work for you, in other words they are not tied to any of the company benefits. (feel free to correct me if you think this explanation is still wrong)

Suspend, discontinue | 中止 | ちゅうし |