Skip to content

Conversation

jrfnl
Copy link
Member

@jrfnl jrfnl commented Sep 20, 2025

Description

GH Actions: "pin" all action runners

Recently there has been more and more focus on securing GH Actions workflows - in part due to some incidents.

The problem with "unpinned" action runners is as follows:

  • Tags are mutable, which means that a tag could point to a safe commit today, but to a malicious commit tomorrow.
    Note that GitHub is currently beta-testing a new "immutable releases" feature (= tags and release artifacts can not be changed anymore once the release is published), but whether that has much effect depends on the ecosystem of the packages using the feature.
    Aside from that, it will likely take years before all projects adopt immutable releases.
  • Action runners often don't even point to a tag, but to a branch, making the used action runner a moving target.
    Note: this type of "floating major" for action runners used to be promoted as good practice when the ecosystem was "young". Insights have since changed.

While it is convenient to use "floating majors" of action runners, as this means you only need to update the workflows on a new major release of the action runner, the price is higher risk of malicious code being executed in workflows.

Dependabot, by now, can automatically submit PRs to update pinned action runners too, as long as the commit-hash pinned runner is followed by a comment listing the released version the commit is pointing to.

So, what with Dependabot being capable of updating workflows with pinned action runners, I believe it is time to update the workflows to the current best practice of using commit-hash pinned action runners.

The downside of this change is that there will be more frequent Dependabot PRs.

If this would become a burden/irritating, the following mitigations can be implemented:

  1. Updating the Dependabot config to group updates instead of sending individual PRs per action runner.
  2. A workflow to automatically merge Dependabot PRs as long as CI passes.

Ref: https://docs.github.com/en/actions/reference/security/secure-use#using-third-party-actions

Dependabot: update config

This commit makes the following change to the Dependabot config:

  • It introduces a "group".
    By default Dependabot raises individual PRs for each update. Now, it will group updates to new minor or patch release for all action runners into a single PR.
    Updates to new major releases of action runners will still be raised as individual PRs.

Refs:

Suggested changelog entry

N/A (general housekeeping)

Recently there has been more and more focus on securing GH Actions workflows - in part due to some incidents.

The problem with "unpinned" action runners is as follows:
* Tags are mutable, which means that a tag could point to a safe commit today, but to a malicious commit tomorrow.
    Note that GitHub is currently beta-testing a new "immutable releases" feature (= tags and release artifacts can not be changed anymore once the release is published), but whether that has much effect depends on the ecosystem of the packages using the feature.
    Aside from that, it will likely take years before all projects adopt _immutable releases_.
* Action runners often don't even point to a tag, but to a branch, making the used action runner a moving target.
    _Note: this type of "floating major" for action runners used to be promoted as good practice when the ecosystem was "young". Insights have since changed._

While it is convenient to use "floating majors" of action runners, as this means you only need to update the workflows on a new major release of the action runner, the price is higher risk of malicious code being executed in workflows.

Dependabot, by now, can automatically submit PRs to update pinned action runners too, as long as the commit-hash pinned runner is followed by a comment listing the released version the commit is pointing to.

So, what with Dependabot being capable of updating workflows with pinned action runners, I believe it is time to update the workflows to the _current_ best practice of using commit-hash pinned action runners.

The downside of this change is that there will be more frequent Dependabot PRs.

If this would become a burden/irritating, the following mitigations can be implemented:
1. Updating the Dependabot config to group updates instead of sending individual PRs per action runner.
2. A workflow to automatically merge Dependabot PRs as long as CI passes.

Ref: https://docs.github.com/en/actions/reference/security/secure-use#using-third-party-actions
This commit makes the following change to the Dependabot config:
* It introduces a "group".
    By default Dependabot raises individual PRs for each update. Now, it will group updates to new minor or patch release for all action runners into a single PR.
    Updates to new major releases of action runners will still be raised as individual PRs.

Refs:
* https://docs.github.com/en/code-security/dependabot/dependabot-version-updates/optimizing-pr-creation-version-updates
* https://docs.github.com/en/code-security/dependabot/working-with-dependabot/dependabot-options-reference
Copy link
Member

@GaryJones GaryJones left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You've got a few version comments with a v prefix, and some without. Is that intentional? Does it matter?

@jrfnl
Copy link
Member Author

jrfnl commented Sep 23, 2025

You've got a few version comments with a v prefix, and some without. Is that intentional? Does it matter?

@GaryJones Yes, that's 100% intentional and it matters. It is required for Dependabot to be able to still update these dependencies. The version number has to match the tag name for that hash of the action runner and even though it is recommended that action runner tags always start with v, not everyone follows that practice.

@GaryJones GaryJones merged commit 4e78b7c into develop Sep 29, 2025
40 checks passed
@GaryJones GaryJones deleted the feature/ghactions-pin-action-runners branch September 29, 2025 14:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants