Skip to content

Restore the original luacheck configuration setup #647

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 23, 2023

Conversation

rdw-software
Copy link
Member

Not sure what the idea was when I renamed it; I guess the error messages from luacheck analyzing its own config were annoying... But IDE support for nonstandard config files is an issue; you have to manually configure it for every workspace in vscode, for example.

Since this also allows running luacheck without args in the project root instead of using a dedicated script, which is easier to understand, I guess it's better to just go back to the original (standard) setup.

@rdw-software rdw-software force-pushed the revert-luacheckrc-rename branch 2 times, most recently from 36f0055 to a7dcdda Compare September 23, 2023 19:42
Not sure what the idea was when I renamed it; I guess the error messages from luacheck analyzing its own config were annoying... But IDE support for nonstandard config files is an issue; you have to manually configure it for every workspace in vscode, for example.

Since this also allows running luacheck without args in the project root instead of using a dedicated script, which is easier to understand, I guess it's better to just go back to the original (standard) setup.
@rdw-software rdw-software force-pushed the revert-luacheckrc-rename branch from a7dcdda to dbd733e Compare September 23, 2023 19:49
@rdw-software rdw-software merged commit cbfc806 into master Sep 23, 2023
@rdw-software rdw-software deleted the revert-luacheckrc-rename branch March 24, 2025 00:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant