This repository has been archived by the owner on May 10, 2022. It is now read-only.
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 25
refactor: refactor getRange operation using scanner #154
Draft
foreverneverer
wants to merge
20
commits into
XiaoMi:master
Choose a base branch
from
foreverneverer:refactor-range-one
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Draft
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
20 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
3a52caa
init
foreverneverer c136513
init
foreverneverer 014752d
init
foreverneverer caf8f40
init
foreverneverer 084d73d
format
foreverneverer 36ec847
format
foreverneverer f996198
format
foreverneverer 3fcb097
refactor
foreverneverer 4bda7bb
add timeou log
foreverneverer d7a5e6f
add timeou log
foreverneverer 788523b
fix comment
foreverneverer db79239
fix comment
foreverneverer 6600b59
fix comment
foreverneverer c4c62a8
fix comment
foreverneverer 7b7d581
fix comment
foreverneverer 3a718ac
fix comment
foreverneverer 7118233
update sortKeys
foreverneverer 75eda82
fix
foreverneverer fdf444c
Merge branch 'master' into refactor-range-one
foreverneverer 71fff51
Merge branch 'master' into refactor-range-one
foreverneverer File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
should we reserver the old interface and add a new interface for these code?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actually, if like
multiGet
, originmultiGetSortKeys
should also be retained and only markedDeprecated
. but the API has been refactored byscan
in previous PR and some user has use it, here I just keep it. @neverchanje @hycdong can give some suggestionThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think it is okay to update code in function multiGetSortKeys, because it is already implemented by scan.