Skip to content

Server-Side Request Forgery in phantomjs-seo

High severity GitHub Reviewed Published May 10, 2021 to the GitHub Advisory Database • Updated Feb 1, 2023

Package

npm phantomjs-seo (npm)

Affected versions

<= 1.0.0

Patched versions

None

Description

This affects all versions of package phantomjs-seo. It is possible for an attacker to craft a url that will be passed to a PhantomJS instance allowing for an SSRF attack.

References

Published by the National Vulnerability Database Oct 6, 2020
Reviewed Apr 21, 2021
Published to the GitHub Advisory Database May 10, 2021
Last updated Feb 1, 2023

Severity

High

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector: More severe the more the remote (logically and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerability.
Attack complexity: More severe for the least complex attacks.
Privileges required: More severe if no privileges are required.
User interaction: More severe when no user interaction is required.
Scope: More severe when a scope change occurs, e.g. one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.
Confidentiality: More severe when loss of data confidentiality is highest, measuring the level of data access available to an unauthorized user.
Integrity: More severe when loss of data integrity is the highest, measuring the consequence of data modification possible by an unauthorized user.
Availability: More severe when the loss of impacted component availability is highest.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N

EPSS score

0.239%
(62nd percentile)

Weaknesses

CVE ID

CVE-2020-7739

GHSA ID

GHSA-j9pj-hx76-92v6

Source code

No known source code
Loading Checking history
See something to contribute? Suggest improvements for this vulnerability.