feat(sdl): `"ram"` storage class
27.45% of diff hit (target 46.94%)
View this Pull Request on Codecov
27.45% of diff hit (target 46.94%)
Annotations
Check warning on line 233 in sdl/v2_1.go
codecov / codecov/patch
sdl/v2_1.go#L232-L233
Added lines #L232 - L233 were not covered by tests
Check warning on line 238 in sdl/v2_1.go
codecov / codecov/patch
sdl/v2_1.go#L235-L238
Added lines #L235 - L238 were not covered by tests
Check warning on line 257 in sdl/v2_1.go
codecov / codecov/patch
sdl/v2_1.go#L256-L257
Added lines #L256 - L257 were not covered by tests
Check warning on line 264 in sdl/v2_1.go
codecov / codecov/patch
sdl/v2_1.go#L264
Added line #L264 was not covered by tests
Check warning on line 269 in sdl/v2_1.go
codecov / codecov/patch
sdl/v2_1.go#L269
Added line #L269 was not covered by tests
Check warning on line 277 in sdl/v2_1.go
codecov / codecov/patch
sdl/v2_1.go#L271-L277
Added lines #L271 - L277 were not covered by tests
Check warning on line 280 in sdl/v2_1.go
codecov / codecov/patch
sdl/v2_1.go#L279-L280
Added lines #L279 - L280 were not covered by tests
Check warning on line 290 in sdl/v2_1.go
codecov / codecov/patch
sdl/v2_1.go#L282-L290
Added lines #L282 - L290 were not covered by tests
Check warning on line 300 in sdl/v2_1.go
codecov / codecov/patch
sdl/v2_1.go#L292-L300
Added lines #L292 - L300 were not covered by tests