Skip to content

Conversation

@gipi
Copy link

@gipi gipi commented Apr 8, 2023

Clarify subtle limitation of this plugin as noted in #116

Copy link
Owner

@aklajnert aklajnert left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you for your contribution. I think that this note should be put into README.rst, in the end of the Usage section. That way it will be also visible on GitHub. Perhaps, there should be two examples - good and bad one. Also, I think it will work with from subprocess import Popen in some cases, but it may not be reliable

@gipi
Copy link
Author

gipi commented Apr 11, 2023

I think what it's most disorienting it's that the examples are all testing directly the Popen() interface, when in the actual use case you test something using it internally.

I'll rework the PR to include some good and bad examples, hopefully before next week.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants