Skip to content

Improve handling of and/or where the result is a type union #1357

Improve handling of and/or where the result is a type union

Improve handling of and/or where the result is a type union #1357

Triggered via pull request September 17, 2024 03:53
Status Success
Total duration 10m 8s
Artifacts

check-python.yaml

on: pull_request
Fit to window
Zoom out
Zoom in

Annotations

2 warnings
tests
Your comment is too long (maximum is 65536 characters), coverage report will not be added.
tests
Try add: "--cov-report=term-missing:skip-covered", or add "hide-report: true", or add "report-only-changed-files: true", or switch to "multiple-files" mode