Skip to content

feat: support manual cleanup sandboxes#446

Open
hittyt wants to merge 2 commits intoalibaba:mainfrom
hittyt:feat/non-expire-sandbox
Open

feat: support manual cleanup sandboxes#446
hittyt wants to merge 2 commits intoalibaba:mainfrom
hittyt:feat/non-expire-sandbox

Conversation

@hittyt
Copy link
Collaborator

@hittyt hittyt commented Mar 14, 2026

Summary

  • Add manual cleanup sandbox lifecycle support by treating omitted or null timeout as non-expiring sandbox creation.
  • Update Docker lifecycle handling, timeout limit validation, SDKs, tests, and docs to support nullable expiresAt and explicit cleanup semantics.
  • Document the controlled rollout path: upgrade SDKs first, then upgrade the server, then start creating manual-cleanup sandboxes.

Testing

  • Not run (explain why)
  • Unit tests
  • Integration tests
  • e2e / manual verification

Breaking Changes

  • None
  • Yes (describe impact and migration path)

Impact:

  • Lifecycle API responses may now return expiresAt = null for manual-cleanup sandboxes.
  • Older SDKs that assume expiresAt is always a timestamp may fail when they create, get, or list manual-cleanup sandboxes.

Migration path:

  • Upgrade SDKs/clients first.
  • Upgrade the server second.
  • Only then start creating sandboxes with timeout omitted or null.
  • Do not introduce manual-cleanup sandboxes into shared environments while older lifecycle API readers are still active.

Checklist

Copy link

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: d45c49734f

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

@hittyt
Copy link
Collaborator Author

hittyt commented Mar 14, 2026

@codex review

Copy link

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 7e35ecba27

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

@hittyt
Copy link
Collaborator Author

hittyt commented Mar 14, 2026

@codex review

Copy link

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: cfeef4cca0

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

@hittyt hittyt force-pushed the feat/non-expire-sandbox branch from cfeef4c to 639e9cb Compare March 15, 2026 00:57
@hittyt
Copy link
Collaborator Author

hittyt commented Mar 15, 2026

@codex review

Copy link

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 639e9cb934

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

@hittyt hittyt requested a review from Pangjiping March 15, 2026 07:03
Copy link
Collaborator

@Pangjiping Pangjiping left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. I'll be working with @Generalwin to get the kubernetes_service work done.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants