Add support for anonymous functions #18
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
This pull request is being automatically deployed with Vercel (learn more). 🔍 Inspect: https://vercel.com/alufers2/openscad-parser/J1263hGtpbaknTQExXhhYj9WYDJD |
|
Hey, I will probably refactor some stuff to support this, since really these are function expressions and not function statements, I will do this on the weekend. |
|
Hi, Sorry for not using your code |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Anonymous functions is a very rarely used feature, but it's used in NopSCADlib.
I tried to add support for them in the least intrusive way.
A separate class would probably match the coding style a bit better, but that'd need adding the
visitNewClassmethods to the visitor API, updating all existing implementations, and would also break people relying on the existing visitor API.Let me know if this is good enough to merge