Skip to content

Conversation

Binlogo
Copy link
Contributor

@Binlogo Binlogo commented Sep 17, 2025

Add helper method to check if a field is required, which always returns false for proto3

Add helper method to check if a field is required, which always returns false for proto3
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 17, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 80.59%. Comparing base (15bbdfe) to head (016b794).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #181      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   80.35%   80.59%   +0.23%     
==========================================
  Files          31       31              
  Lines        5295     5297       +2     
==========================================
+ Hits         4255     4269      +14     
+ Misses       1040     1028      -12     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@Binlogo Binlogo force-pushed the features/field-is-required branch from 574f494 to 016b794 Compare September 18, 2025 17:34
@andrewhickman andrewhickman merged commit 77c2f08 into andrewhickman:main Sep 19, 2025
7 checks passed
@andrewhickman
Copy link
Owner

Thanks!

@github-actions github-actions bot mentioned this pull request Sep 13, 2025
@Binlogo Binlogo deleted the features/field-is-required branch September 20, 2025 01:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants