Skip to content

Conversation

@telpirion
Copy link
Contributor

This PR adds the android_datastore_preferences_migrate region tag. Internal issue 446749253 tracks.

Note: I will add a corresponding snippet for proto & JSON preferences as I have time. Thanks!

@snippet-bot
Copy link

snippet-bot bot commented Jan 6, 2026

Here is the summary of changes.

You are about to add 1 region tag.

This comment is generated by snippet-bot.
If you find problems with this result, please file an issue at:
https://github.com/googleapis/repo-automation-bots/issues.
To update this comment, add snippet-bot:force-run label or use the checkbox below:

  • Refresh this comment

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @telpirion, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request provides a clear example of how to implement SharedPreferencesMigration when transitioning from the legacy SharedPreferences API to the modern Preferences DataStore in Android applications. The added snippet illustrates the necessary configuration to produce migrations, ensuring a smooth data transfer for users.

Highlights

  • SharedPreferences Migration Example: Introduces a new commented-out code example demonstrating how to use SharedPreferencesMigration to migrate existing SharedPreferences data to Preferences DataStore.
  • Region Tag: Adds the android_datastore_preferences_migrate region tag to the new migration example code.

🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This PR adds an example for SharedPreferences migration. While the intent is good, the implementation has a few issues. The most critical is a missing import that makes the code snippet incomplete. Additionally, the way the snippet is commented out will likely prevent documentation tools from extracting it correctly. I've also included suggestions for a typo and to follow Kotlin's best practices for constants. Addressing these points will ensure the example is correct, complete, and functional.

@kkuan2011
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM from snippets repo perspective, may want to get Elif to take a look from DataStore perspective

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants