Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ALLOW_LOCAL_RESOURCE_MANAGEMENT truthiness #2255

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 10, 2024

Conversation

jctanner
Copy link
Collaborator

@jctanner jctanner commented Sep 5, 2024

@jctanner jctanner marked this pull request as draft September 6, 2024 19:55
@jctanner jctanner changed the title ALLOW_LOCAL_RESOURCE_MANAGEMENT truthiness [WIP] ALLOW_LOCAL_RESOURCE_MANAGEMENT truthiness Sep 6, 2024
@jctanner jctanner marked this pull request as ready for review September 9, 2024 19:44
@jctanner jctanner requested a review from a team September 9, 2024 19:44
@jctanner jctanner changed the title [WIP] ALLOW_LOCAL_RESOURCE_MANAGEMENT truthiness ALLOW_LOCAL_RESOURCE_MANAGEMENT truthiness Sep 9, 2024
@jctanner jctanner force-pushed the LOCAL_RESOURCES_SUPERUSER_OVERRIDE branch from 2888292 to a3b90f5 Compare September 10, 2024 13:21
@jctanner jctanner merged commit fa41bdc into ansible:master Sep 10, 2024
19 of 22 checks passed
Andersson007 added a commit to Andersson007/galaxy_ng that referenced this pull request Sep 16, 2024
No-Issue

ALLOW_LOCAL_RESOURCE_MANAGEMENT truthiness (ansible#2255)

Add fuzzy logic to ui/v2/users for ALLOW_LOCAL_RESOURCE_MANAGEMENT.

No-Issue

Signed-off-by: James Tanner <[email protected]>

Add CI upload junit xml test results (ansible#2257)

* upload junit xml test results
* run only in ansible repo
* upload inside the docker
No-Issue

Fix SonarCloud readability issues (ansible#2221)

No-Issue

Exclude vendored code from SonarCloud analysis (ansible#2264)

No-Issue

Mark more 2.5 tests (ansible#2262)

mark more 2.5 tests

No-Issue
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants