Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[HUDI-8616] DataHub meta sync improvements (#12456) #12678

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: branch-0.x
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

sgomezvillamor
Copy link
Contributor

@sgomezvillamor sgomezvillamor commented Jan 20, 2025

Change Logs

Applies PR #12456 on top of branch-0.x branch.

And supersedes PR #12565

Impact

From PR #12456

This update significantly enhances the integration by providing richer information.

Risk level (write none, low medium or high below)

Low, as per PR #12456

Documentation Update

Describe any necessary documentation update if there is any new feature, config, or user-facing change. If not, put "none".

  • The config description must be updated if new configs are added or the default value of the configs are changed
  • Any new feature or user-facing change requires updating the Hudi website. Please create a Jira ticket, attach the
    ticket number here and follow the instruction to make
    changes to the website.

Contributor's checklist

  • Read through contributor's guide
  • Change Logs and Impact were stated clearly
  • Adequate tests were added if applicable
  • CI passed

@github-actions github-actions bot added the size:XL PR with lines of changes > 1000 label Jan 20, 2025
@sgomezvillamor sgomezvillamor marked this pull request as ready for review January 20, 2025 12:39
Comment on lines +100 to +101
//.map(HoodieInstant::requestedTime);
.map(HoodieInstant::getTimestamp);
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@xushiyan, requestedTime is how this was implemented in master. However, there isn't such a method in branch-0.x for HoodieInstant. Is getTimestamp a valid alternative?

protected Option<String> getLastCommitCompletionTime() {
// int countInstants = getActiveTimeline().countInstants();
// return getActiveTimeline()
// .getInstantsOrderedByCompletionTime()
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@xushiyan, while I could handle the sorting, I didn't find any reference to completion time in HoodieInstant on branch-0.x, so I skipped it. Any suggestion?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

as per your feedback, commit 58f3bea

@hudi-bot
Copy link

CI report:

Bot commands @hudi-bot supports the following commands:
  • @hudi-bot run azure re-run the last Azure build

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
size:XL PR with lines of changes > 1000
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants