feat(stream): add support of the XAUTOCLAIM command

[LindaSummer]

Issue

close #2181

Proposed Changes

• implement XAUTOCLAIM command
• add test cases following Redis tests

# Comment
1. go Redis client checks count parameter before passing to server, so count == 0 test case can't be created in go test.
2. go Redis client has no delete ids in response, so related test case can't be created.

[PragmaTwice]

go Redis client checks count parameter before passing to server, so count == 0 test case can't be created in go test.
go Redis client has no delete ids in response, so related test case can't be created.

Maybe we can use redis.Do(ctx, "XAUTOCLAIM", ...) to create test cases.

[LindaSummer]

go Redis client checks count parameter before passing to server, so count == 0 test case can't be created in go test.
go Redis client has no delete ids in response, so related test case can't be created.

Maybe we can use redis.Do(ctx, "XAUTOCLAIM", ...) to create test cases.

Thanks for your suggestions. Got it! I will add missing cases and fix CI issues today. 😊

[LindaSummer]

Hi @PragmaTwice ,
Thanks for your suggestions.
I have added missing test cases and the missing header algorithm in Darwin build.

Plus, I find that there is warning during Darwin Clang build.
Maybe we should make a new PR to fix it.

/Users/runner/work/kvrocks/kvrocks/src/commands/cmd_stream.cc:145:36: warning: local variable 'result' will be copied despite being returned by name [-Wreturn-std-move]
        if (!result.IsOK()) return result;
                                   ^~~~~~
/Users/runner/work/kvrocks/kvrocks/src/commands/cmd_stream.cc:145:36: note: call 'std::move' explicitly to avoid copying
        if (!result.IsOK()) return result;
                                   ^~~~~~
                                   std::move(result)

[LindaSummer]

Hi @PragmaTwice ,

I find that I can run GitHub Actions in my own repo first.
I have run CI in my own repo and fix all build issues now.

Thanks very much.

Best Regards,
Edward

[LindaSummer]

Hi @torwig ,

I have updated related code.
Please take a look.
Thanks very much.

Best Regards,
Edward

[sonarcloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
15 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
63.1% Coverage on New Code
2.1% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud

[PragmaTwice]

Thank you for your contribution!