cxd56xx: use small lock in arch/arm/src/cxd56xx/cxd56_clock.c

[hujun260]

Summary

cxd56xx: use small lock in arch/arm/src/cxd56xx/cxd56_clock.c

Impact

cxd56xx

Testing

ci

[nuttxpr]

[Experimental Bot, please feedback here]

No. This PR does not adequately meet the NuttX requirements. While it provides a summary title, it lacks crucial details. Here's why:

• Insufficient Summary: "cxd56xx: use small lock in arch/arm/src/cxd56xx/cxd56_clock.c" only states what was changed, not why. It needs to explain the reason for using a small lock (e.g., performance improvement, fixing a deadlock, reducing resource usage). It should also describe how the change works and mention any related issues.

• Incomplete Impact Assessment: Simply stating "cxd56xx" doesn't explain the impact. Each impact category (user, build, hardware, documentation, security, compatibility) should be explicitly addressed with "YES" or "NO" and a description if "YES." For example, even if the answer is NO for most, it should say "Impact on user: NO" etc.

• Missing Testing Details: "ci" is insufficient. The PR needs to specify the build host OS, CPU, compiler, and the target architecture, board, and configuration used for testing. Crucially, it's missing the actual testing logs before and after the change to demonstrate the improvement or fix.

In short, the PR needs to be significantly more descriptive to meet the NuttX requirements. It must provide the missing context and evidence to allow reviewers to understand and evaluate the change effectively.