Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[improvement][broker] If there is a deadlock in the service, the probe should return a failure because the service may be unavailable #23634

Open
wants to merge 13 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

yyj8
Copy link
Contributor

@yyj8 yyj8 commented Nov 24, 2024

Fixes #23635

Main Issue: #xyz

PIP: #xyz

Motivation

In some special scenarios, when the broker service has a deadlock, it needs to be able to automatically recover instead of requiring manual intervention. For example, when the service is deployed in a customer environment, we cannot directly manage it. If the service has a deadlock, the k8s probe should return a failure because the service may be unavailable. The probe failure triggers a broker pod restart to resolve the deadlock.

Modifications

Add deadlock detection in the probe. If a deadlock exists, print the thread stack and return a service unavailable exception.

Verifying this change

  • Make sure that the change passes the CI checks.

(Please pick either of the following options)

This change is a trivial rework / code cleanup without any test coverage.

(or)

This change is already covered by existing tests, such as (please describe tests).

(or)

This change added tests and can be verified as follows:

(example:)

  • Added integration tests for end-to-end deployment with large payloads (10MB)
  • Extended integration test for recovery after broker failure

Does this pull request potentially affect one of the following parts:

If the box was checked, please highlight the changes

  • Dependencies (add or upgrade a dependency)
  • The public API
  • The schema
  • The default values of configurations
  • The threading model
  • The binary protocol
  • The REST endpoints
  • The admin CLI options
  • The metrics
  • Anything that affects deployment

Documentation

  • doc
  • doc-required
  • doc-not-needed
  • doc-complete

Matching PR in forked repository

PR in forked repository:
yyj8#10

…return a failure because the service may be unavailable
Copy link

@yyj8 Please add the following content to your PR description and select a checkbox:

- [ ] `doc` <!-- Your PR contains doc changes -->
- [ ] `doc-required` <!-- Your PR changes impact docs and you will update later -->
- [ ] `doc-not-needed` <!-- Your PR changes do not impact docs -->
- [ ] `doc-complete` <!-- Docs have been already added -->

@github-actions github-actions bot added doc-not-needed Your PR changes do not impact docs and removed doc-label-missing labels Nov 24, 2024
Copy link
Member

@lhotari lhotari left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There's already a deadlock check in the health check:

@GET
@Path("/health")
@ApiOperation(value = "Run a healthCheck against the broker")
@ApiResponses(value = {
@ApiResponse(code = 200, message = "Everything is OK"),
@ApiResponse(code = 403, message = "Don't have admin permission"),
@ApiResponse(code = 404, message = "Cluster doesn't exist"),
@ApiResponse(code = 500, message = "Internal server error")})
public void healthCheck(@Suspended AsyncResponse asyncResponse,
@ApiParam(value = "Topic Version")
@QueryParam("topicVersion") TopicVersion topicVersion) {
validateSuperUserAccessAsync()
.thenAccept(__ -> checkDeadlockedThreads())
.thenCompose(__ -> internalRunHealthCheck(topicVersion))
.thenAccept(__ -> {
LOG.info("[{}] Successfully run health check.", clientAppId());
asyncResponse.resume(Response.ok("ok").build());
}).exceptionally(ex -> {
LOG.error("[{}] Fail to run health check.", clientAppId(), ex);
resumeAsyncResponseExceptionally(asyncResponse, ex);
return null;
});
}
private void checkDeadlockedThreads() {
ThreadMXBean threadBean = ManagementFactory.getThreadMXBean();
long[] threadIds = threadBean.findDeadlockedThreads();
if (threadIds != null && threadIds.length > 0) {
ThreadInfo[] threadInfos = threadBean.getThreadInfo(threadIds, false, false);
String threadNames = Arrays.stream(threadInfos)
.map(threadInfo -> threadInfo.getThreadName() + "(tid=" + threadInfo.getThreadId() + ")").collect(
Collectors.joining(", "));
if (System.currentTimeMillis() - threadDumpLoggedTimestamp
> LOG_THREADDUMP_INTERVAL_WHEN_DEADLOCK_DETECTED) {
threadDumpLoggedTimestamp = System.currentTimeMillis();
LOG.error("Deadlocked threads detected. {}\n{}", threadNames,
ThreadDumpUtil.buildThreadDiagnosticString());
} else {
LOG.error("Deadlocked threads detected. {}", threadNames);
}
throw new IllegalStateException("Deadlocked threads detected. " + threadNames);
}
}

It also contains an example of how to check deadlocks.

…return a failure because the service may be unavailable
@yyj8 yyj8 requested a review from lhotari November 25, 2024 14:38
@lhotari lhotari changed the title [fix][broker]If there is a deadlock in the service, the probe should return a failure because the service may be unavailable [improvement][broker] If there is a deadlock in the service, the probe should return a failure because the service may be unavailable Nov 26, 2024
yyj8 added 2 commits November 26, 2024 23:45
…e should return a failure because the service may be unavailable
…e should return a failure because the service may be unavailable
Copy link
Member

@lhotari lhotari left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good work @yyj8. Some suggestions for field naming and simplifying the code comment.

…e should return a failure because the service may be unavailable
…e should return a failure because the service may be unavailable.
@yyj8 yyj8 requested a review from lhotari November 27, 2024 07:41
…e should return a failure because the service may be unavailable.
@lhotari
Copy link
Member

lhotari commented Nov 27, 2024

@yyj8 btw. when you add commits to the PR, it's useful to make the commit title about the change and not copy the PR title into the follow up commits. When the PR is merged, all commits are squashed so they won't end up in the final merged commit. The benefit of the commit messages in the PR commits is that the reviewer will be able to follow the changes.

@lhotari lhotari added this to the 4.1.0 milestone Nov 29, 2024
yyj8 added 2 commits December 4, 2024 21:42
…e should return a failure because the service may be unavailable. Add lastPrintThreadDumpTimestamp field to control the interval time for printing complete thread stack information.
…e should return a failure because the service may be unavailable. Add unit testing code.
@yyj8
Copy link
Contributor Author

yyj8 commented Dec 4, 2024

@yyj8 btw. when you add commits to the PR, it's useful to make the commit title about the change and not copy the PR title into the follow up commits. When the PR is merged, all commits are squashed so they won't end up in the final merged commit. The benefit of the commit messages in the PR commits is that the reviewer will be able to follow the changes.

Very good suggestion, future code submissions will include detailed instructions for modifying the code.

yyj8 added 2 commits December 4, 2024 22:59
…e should return a failure because the service may be unavailable. Add unit testing code.
…e should return a failure because the service may be unavailable. Add unit testing code.
@yyj8 yyj8 requested a review from lhotari December 8, 2024 04:01
yyj8 added 2 commits December 22, 2024 11:25
…e should return a failure because the service may be unavailable. Add unit testing code, shutdown deadlock thread.
…e should return a failure because the service may be unavailable. Add unit testing code, shutdown deadlock thread.
@yyj8 yyj8 requested a review from lhotari December 22, 2024 03:33
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There shouldn't be a need to add this file since Mockito can be used to mock a ServletContext for the test.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
doc-not-needed Your PR changes do not impact docs
Projects
None yet
2 participants