Support LMQ dispatch in case if Consume Queue Store is RocksDB-based

[lizhanhui]

Which Issue(s) This PR Fixes

to #8829

Brief Description

How Did You Test This Change?

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 42.55639% with 382 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 47.29%. Comparing base (1e0b08f) to head (b518616).
Report is 2 commits behind head on develop.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
...ocketmq/broker/processor/AdminBrokerProcessor.java	37.90%	70 Missing and 7 partials ⚠️
...rocketmq/broker/metrics/ConsumerLagCalculator.java	0.00%	43 Missing ⚠️
...rocketmq/store/queue/RocksDBConsumeQueueStore.java	48.14%	34 Missing and 8 partials ⚠️
...tieredstore/metrics/TieredStoreMetricsManager.java	0.00%	39 Missing ⚠️
...mq/store/queue/RocksDBConsumeQueueOffsetTable.java	70.17%	21 Missing and 13 partials ⚠️
...rocketmq/broker/processor/PopMessageProcessor.java	16.66%	20 Missing ⚠️
...che/rocketmq/broker/metrics/PopMetricsManager.java	7.69%	12 Missing ⚠️
...main/java/org/apache/rocketmq/store/CommitLog.java	45.00%	10 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
...ocketmq/store/exception/ConsumeQueueException.java	0.00%	10 Missing ⚠️
...pache/rocketmq/store/exception/StoreException.java	0.00%	10 Missing ⚠️
... and 21 more

Additional details and impacted files

@@              Coverage Diff              @@
##             develop    #8842      +/-   ##
=============================================
- Coverage      47.46%   47.29%   -0.17%     
+ Complexity     11617    11610       -7     
=============================================
  Files           1284     1290       +6     
  Lines          90025    90293     +268     
  Branches       11585    11609      +24     
=============================================
- Hits           42728    42706      -22     
- Misses         42061    42314     +253     
- Partials        5236     5273      +37     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[RongtongJin]

@LetLetMe PTAL～

[lizhanhui]

@redlsz @leizhiyuan Please also take a look

[fuyou001]

LGTM

[tianliuliu]

LGTM