Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: replace imp built-in module usage for future Python3.12 usage #31622

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

hainenber
Copy link
Contributor

chore(test/integration): replace imp built-in module usage for future Python3.12 usage

SUMMARY

imp module is deprecated in Python 3.4 and removed in Python3.12. This replacement will help with extending Superset support for Python3.12 in the future

BEFORE/AFTER SCREENSHOTS OR ANIMATED GIF

N/A

TESTING INSTRUCTIONS

This should pass CI checks

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

  • Has associated issue:
  • Required feature flags:
  • Changes UI
  • Includes DB Migration (follow approval process in SIP-59)
    • Migration is atomic, supports rollback & is backwards-compatible
    • Confirm DB migration upgrade and downgrade tested
    • Runtime estimates and downtime expectations provided
  • Introduces new feature or API
  • Removes existing feature or API

`imp` module is deprecated in Python 3.4 and removed in Python3.12. This replacement will help with extending Superset support for Python3.12 in the future

Signed-off-by: hainenber <[email protected]>
Copy link

@korbit-ai korbit-ai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I've completed my review and didn't find any issues... but I did find this dog.

  / \__
 (    @\___
 /         O
/   (_____/
/_____/   U

Need a new review? Comment /korbit-review on this PR and I'll review your latest changes.

Korbit Guide: Usage and Customization

Interacting with Korbit

  • You can manually ask Korbit to review your PR using the /korbit-review command in a comment at the root of your PR.
  • You can ask Korbit to generate a new PR description using the /korbit-generate-pr-description command in any comment on your PR.
  • Too many Korbit comments? I can resolve all my comment threads if you use the /korbit-resolve command in any comment on your PR.
  • Chat with Korbit on issues we post by tagging @korbit-ai in your reply.
  • Help train Korbit to improve your reviews by giving a 👍 or 👎 on the comments Korbit posts.

Customizing Korbit

  • Check out our docs on how you can make Korbit work best for you and your team.
  • Customize Korbit for your organization through the Korbit Console.

Current Korbit Configuration

General Settings
Setting Value
Review Schedule Automatic excluding drafts
Max Issue Count 10
Automatic PR Descriptions
Issue Categories
Category Enabled
Naming
Database Operations
Documentation
Logging
Error Handling
Systems and Environment
Objects and Data Structures
Readability and Maintainability
Asynchronous Processing
Design Patterns
Third-Party Libraries
Performance
Security
Functionality

Feedback and Support

Note

Korbit Pro is free for open source projects 🎉

Looking to add Korbit to your team? Get started with a free 2 week trial here

Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 26, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 83.75%. Comparing base (76d897e) to head (6ad9f38).
Report is 1240 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           master   #31622       +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage   60.48%   83.75%   +23.26%     
===========================================
  Files        1931      538     -1393     
  Lines       76236    39128    -37108     
  Branches     8568        0     -8568     
===========================================
- Hits        46114    32773    -13341     
+ Misses      28017     6355    -21662     
+ Partials     2105        0     -2105     
Flag Coverage Δ
hive 48.75% <ø> (-0.41%) ⬇️
javascript ?
mysql 76.48% <ø> (?)
postgres 76.57% <ø> (?)
presto 53.27% <ø> (-0.54%) ⬇️
python 83.75% <ø> (+20.27%) ⬆️
sqlite 76.03% <ø> (?)
unit 60.88% <ø> (+3.25%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@hainenber
Copy link
Contributor Author

Yikes, failing CI due to wrong Docker credentials

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant