Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(feature flag): Setting TAGGING_SYSTEM to True by default #32318

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

rusackas
Copy link
Member

SUMMARY

Following on the heels of #32317, and a discussion with @eschutho, we feel that this feature is ready for promotion to being on by default, whether this makes it into 5.0 or a subsequent minor. Again tagging @kgabryje @michael-s-molina @mistercrunch in case there are any concerns here preventing this change.

BEFORE/AFTER SCREENSHOTS OR ANIMATED GIF

TESTING INSTRUCTIONS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

  • Has associated issue:
  • Required feature flags:
  • Changes UI
  • Includes DB Migration (follow approval process in SIP-59)
    • Migration is atomic, supports rollback & is backwards-compatible
    • Confirm DB migration upgrade and downgrade tested
    • Runtime estimates and downtime expectations provided
  • Introduces new feature or API
  • Removes existing feature or API

Copy link

@korbit-ai korbit-ai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I've completed my review and didn't find any issues.

Files scanned
File Path Reviewed
superset/config.py

Explore our documentation to understand the languages and file types we support and the files we ignore.

Need a new review? Comment /korbit-review on this PR and I'll review your latest changes.

Korbit Guide: Usage and Customization

Interacting with Korbit

  • You can manually ask Korbit to review your PR using the /korbit-review command in a comment at the root of your PR.
  • You can ask Korbit to generate a new PR description using the /korbit-generate-pr-description command in any comment on your PR.
  • Too many Korbit comments? I can resolve all my comment threads if you use the /korbit-resolve command in any comment on your PR.
  • Chat with Korbit on issues we post by tagging @korbit-ai in your reply.
  • Help train Korbit to improve your reviews by giving a 👍 or 👎 on the comments Korbit posts.

Customizing Korbit

  • Check out our docs on how you can make Korbit work best for you and your team.
  • Customize Korbit for your organization through the Korbit Console.

Current Korbit Configuration

General Settings
Setting Value
Review Schedule Automatic excluding drafts
Max Issue Count 10
Automatic PR Descriptions
Issue Categories
Category Enabled
Documentation
Logging
Error Handling
Readability
Design
Performance
Security
Functionality

Feedback and Support

Note

Korbit Pro is free for open source projects 🎉

Looking to add Korbit to your team? Get started with a free 2 week trial here

Copy link
Member

@mistercrunch mistercrunch left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yup!

@rusackas
Copy link
Member Author

Whoa... CI is not happy. Not sure yet what can of worms I've opened here :/

@mistercrunch
Copy link
Member

Wondering who's the best person to help, though should be a simple glitch around feature flags handling in tests/builds(?)

@sadpandajoe
Copy link
Member

Shouldn't we mention this in UPDATING.md to let people know it's on by default now?

@mistercrunch
Copy link
Member

Shouldn't we mention this in UPDATING.md to let people know it's on by default now?

I agree that feature flag default changes aren't breaking changes, but should be noted in UPDATING.md, where more heads up to the person performing the release is better. It allows them to know about the change in behavior, and prevent it if they decide so.

Copy link
Contributor

@sadpandajoe Processing your ephemeral environment request here. Action: up.

@sadpandajoe
Copy link
Member

@rusackas I pushed up a possible fix for the e2e cypress test that's failing. When tags are turned on, we add a Tags column between Status and Owners, so the e2e was failing since it was expecting Owners but it was returning Tags

Copy link
Contributor

@sadpandajoe Ephemeral environment spinning up at http://52.13.110.49:8080. Credentials are 'admin'/'admin'. Please allow several minutes for bootstrapping and startup.

@sadpandajoe sadpandajoe force-pushed the enable-tagging-system branch from e85222e to daa5d80 Compare February 21, 2025 21:43
@sadpandajoe sadpandajoe force-pushed the enable-tagging-system branch from daa5d80 to f80d98b Compare February 21, 2025 21:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants