Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
variables/options
should be required ifTVariables
is not empty/default #11241base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
variables/options
should be required ifTVariables
is not empty/default #11241Changes from 3 commits
cdc82ea
80b52fc
dbbbd10
f3aecc7
08793f5
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Where this causes problems is in generic implementations like our
Query
HOC:Similar errors would always appear if we go through with the "options/variables sometimes required" approach here - there is no way of implementing that without that result.
Luckily, as you can see there's an easy fix - but this might cause some minor churn.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Indenting these tests like this to highlight where exactly I am expecting the error to be propagated to the user.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I have decided to use the "one signature, tuple behind conditional approach" here, as staying with only one public overload will make errors more readable and "localized".
This is how an error would look like if we had two overloads - the full call is marked red and the error is hard to read:
Instead, using this approach, the error looks like this - only
variables
are highlighted and the error is much more readable:There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Also something to highlight in these screenshots: the interface name
QueryHooksOptionsWithVariables
is a lot clearer than something calculated inline, likeQueryHookOptions<...> & { variables: TVariables }