-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 820
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
GitHub Workflows security hardening #4728
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
|
@sashashura is attempting to deploy a commit to the The Guild Team on Vercel. A member of the Team first needs to authorize it. |
@@ -1,55 +0,0 @@ | |||
name: Algolia Integrity |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Are these removed by mistake?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
One sec I'll merge my branch with master. It was removed there.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please take a look now.
Signed-off-by: Alex <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Alex <[email protected]>
d34fb65
to
b8bf584
Compare
This PR adds explicit permissions section to workflows. This is a security best practice because by default workflows run with extended set of permissions (except from
on: pull_request
from external forks). By specifying any permission explicitly all others are set to none. By using the principle of least privilege the damage a compromised workflow can do (because of an injection or compromised third party tool or action) is restricted.It is recommended to have most strict permissions on the top level and grant write permissions on job level case by case.