Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Sec-fixes #598

Open
wants to merge 17 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Sec-fixes #598

wants to merge 17 commits into from

Conversation

ATGardner
Copy link
Collaborator

@ATGardner ATGardner commented Oct 4, 2024

  • update golang to 1.23
  • upgraded github.com/argoproj/argo-cd/v2 v2.10.0 => v2.13.0
  • upgraded github.com/go-jose/go-jose/v4 v4.0.2 => v4.0.4
  • upgraded github.com/briandowns/spinner v1.23.0 => v1.23.1
  • replaced github.com/ghodss/yaml with sigs.k8s.io/yaml
  • upgraded github.com/spf13/viper v1.18.2 => v1.19.0

Signed-off-by: Noam Gal <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Noam Gal <[email protected]>
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Oct 4, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 66.66667% with 2 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 40.66%. Comparing base (98519df) to head (7e9aa3f).

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
cmd/commands/project.go 0.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
pkg/kube/kube.go 0.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #598      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   40.67%   40.66%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files          41       41              
  Lines        6732     6730       -2     
==========================================
- Hits         2738     2737       -1     
+ Misses       3880     3879       -1     
  Partials      114      114              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@ATGardner
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/ci

1 similar comment
@ATGardner
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/ci

@ATGardner
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/ci

@ATGardner ATGardner added the security needed for prisma check label Oct 7, 2024
@ATGardner
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/ci

2 similar comments
@ATGardner
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/ci

@ATGardner
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/ci

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
security needed for prisma check
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants