Use artefactual repositories for packages #19
Conversation
The old repos have not been updated to use acmetool v0.2.1. The v0.2.1 packages have been created with am-packbuild and published in artefactual package repositories.
mamedin
requested review from
amayita,
DavidHume-ArtefactualSystems,
hakamine,
luisilara and
scollazo
|
NOTE: Ubuntu 20.04 (focal) has included acmetool 0.2.1 in official repositories, so we don't need to add the repo for Ubuntu 20.04: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@mamedin - makes sense to me - I gather you've tried this role with the changes, on one of your test clusters or otherwise?
(Later in day edit: @luisilara and @hakamine have anyway, so there we go!)
|
Tested with RHEL 7.6 without a problem acmetool --version
go version go1.13.14 linux/amd64 gc cgo=true
acmetool CentOS version 0.2.1 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thank you @mamedin. I tested on ubuntu 18.04 for a new deployment, and also for an upgrade (from the old acmetool package), no problems. Also noticed that the new packages install on /bin/acmetool (instead of /usr/bin/acmetool as the old packages did)
Thanks Hector, that's true. It should be changed here: https://github.com/artefactual-labs/am-packbuild/blob/qa/1.x/debs/bionic/acmetool/debian/rules#L21-L23 I'm going to create a new am-packbuild PR and new packages because the 20.04 package uses /usr/bin path. CentOS is already using /usr/bin path. |
New ubuntu packages with fixed path (/usr/bin) have been added to the repo. |
The old repos have not been updated to use acmetool v0.2.1. The v0.2.1 packages
have been created with am-packbuild and published in artefactual package
repositories:
https://packages.archivematica.org/acmetool/ubuntu/
https://packages.archivematica.org/acmetool/centos/
Connects to #17