Fix to avoid premature exit #1
Open
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Hi Thanks for the pull request! This is not about how fast is disc access etc... and I'm not flushing to disk in any example. So I guess comparison is fare enough. What do you think ? Thanks, |
|
Hi! If you don't sync after the (zero copy) sendfile call the disk write gets queued (on my linux system) and you can't compare the execution time! Regards |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hi!
You should sync with the destination to avoid wrong measurement results.
No sync:
./fcopy /tmp/rbigfile.dat /tmp/wbigfile2.dat 2 0.00s user 0.24s system 99% cpu 0.242 total
0.242 seconds for a 1 GB file on a ~180MB/s hard disk...
grep Dirty /proc/meminfo
Dirty: 1048476 kB
There we go, dirty memory that isn't flushed yet to the disk!
After adding the fdatasync call:
./fcopy /tmp/rbigfile.dat /tmp/wbigfile2.dat 2 0.00s user 0.32s system 4% cpu 6.461 total
Regards!