Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

DG-1746 Support custom relationshipDef for any Assets linking #3551

Merged
merged 15 commits into from
Oct 9, 2024

Conversation

nikhilbonte21
Copy link

Change description

Hagerty (Customer) wants a way to define custom objects that are built on top of Atlan’s Assets interface, create custom definitions for relationships between 2 arbitrary assets and want some properties on the relationship as well.

Overall we try to keep it very generic to make it GA.


Type of change

  • Bug fix (fixes an issue)
  • New feature (adds functionality)

Related issues

DG-1746 Support custom relationshipDef for any Assets linking

Checklists

Development

  • Lint rules pass locally
  • Application changes have been tested thoroughly
  • Automated tests covering modified code pass

Security

  • Security impact of change has been considered
  • Code follows company security practices and guidelines

Code review

  • Pull request has a descriptive title and context useful to a reviewer. Screenshots or screencasts are attached as necessary
  • "Ready for review" label attached and reviewers assigned
  • Changes have been reviewed by at least one other contributor
  • Pull request linked to task tracker where applicable

(cherry picked from commit b4d291f)
(cherry picked from commit e30bbd6)
(cherry picked from commit aaacb90)
(cherry picked from commit 366acac)
(cherry picked from commit 900db32)
(cherry picked from commit 1c4bdd8)
(cherry picked from commit f3b9bfa)
(cherry picked from commit d09ed26)
(cherry picked from commit 3942535)
@nikhilbonte21
Copy link
Author

Continuing #3479

@nikhilbonte21 nikhilbonte21 merged commit 5da7de0 into master Oct 9, 2024
12 of 13 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants