feat(autoware_lanelet_map_validator): add dangling reference checker to non existing intersection_area

[soblin]

Description

This PR aims to add checker if any intersection lanelets (namely with turn_direction tag) has valid VALUE as the intersection_area key. If there are no intersection_area with corresponding VALUE id, it is dangling reference.

How was this PR tested?

Added a test map "intersection_area_with_dangling_reference.osm" with:

• valid reference to existing intersection_area 10803 (lanelet 59)
• dangling reference to non existing intersection_area 777 (lanelet 53)

Notes for reviewers

None.

Effects on system behavior

None.

[github-actions]

Thank you for contributing to the Autoware project!

🚧 If your pull request is in progress, switch it to draft mode.

Please ensure:

• You've checked our contribution guidelines.
• Your PR follows our pull request guidelines.
• All required CI checks pass before marking the PR ready for review.

[TaikiYamada4]

Thank you for the great work!
I wrote my opinions below so please check them out.

Aside those comments

• Could you write a brief document to explain what this validator can do?
• Could you add this to autoware_requirement_set.json like the following?

  {
    "id": "vm-03-01",
    "validators": [
      {
        "name": "mapping.intersection.intersection_area_dangling_reference"
      }
    ]
  },

[TaikiYamada4]

@soblin
Since the functionality is perfect, I'll approve this PR 👍
However I have some comments about the phrasing in the document so could you check them out? It also relates to the spelling check CI.

[TaikiYamada4]

Lookup to intersection_area from the reporeted lanelet will cause runtime error.

"The reported lanelet will cause a runtime error when attempting to look up the non-existent intersection_area." might be more clear.

[TaikiYamada4]

• check -> checks
• I think the word countercase is not a popular word so how about circumstance or anomaly?