Skip to content

chore: upgrade eslint rule plugins #32573

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 10 commits into from
Dec 19, 2024
Merged

chore: upgrade eslint rule plugins #32573

merged 10 commits into from
Dec 19, 2024

Conversation

rix0rrr
Copy link
Contributor

@rix0rrr rix0rrr commented Dec 18, 2024

In the new monorepo, we are required to use eslint@9 because projen forces it.

  • eslint@9 in the new repo requires typescript-eslint@8, and rules have disappeared from those plugins and been moved to the @stylistic plugin.

We therefore move to @typescript-eslint@8 and @stylistic in this repo already, so that we can move the code over integrally.

  • typescript-eslint@8 requires eslint@8, so also upgrade eslint to 8 in this repo.
  • eslint@8 requires an update of eslint-plugin-jest

This change activated a number of rules that were being silently ignored in the past, or upgrades of rule packages work in more situations. In any case, it also includes a number of code fixes to make the new rules pass.

Notable changes:

  • toThrowError -> toThrow
  • toBeCalledWith -> toHaveBeenCalledWith
  • Insertion of a bunch of missing semicolons

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache-2.0 license

In the new monorepo, we are required to use `eslint@9` because projen
forces it.

`eslint@9` requires `typescript-eslint` plugins @8, and rules have
disappeared from those plugins and been moved to the `@stylistic`
plugin.

Make the same changes in this repo already so that we can move the
code over without changing it.
@rix0rrr rix0rrr requested a review from a team as a code owner December 18, 2024 13:40
@aws-cdk-automation aws-cdk-automation requested a review from a team December 18, 2024 13:40
@github-actions github-actions bot added the p2 label Dec 18, 2024
@mergify mergify bot added the contribution/core This is a PR that came from AWS. label Dec 18, 2024
Copy link
Collaborator

@aws-cdk-automation aws-cdk-automation left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The pull request linter has failed. See the aws-cdk-automation comment below for failure reasons. If you believe this pull request should receive an exemption, please comment and provide a justification.

A comment requesting an exemption should contain the text Exemption Request. Additionally, if clarification is needed add Clarification Request to a comment.

@aws-cdk-automation aws-cdk-automation added the pr/needs-cli-test-run This PR needs CLI tests run against it. label Dec 18, 2024
@rix0rrr rix0rrr added the pr-linter/cli-integ-tested Assert that any CLI changes have been integ tested label Dec 19, 2024
@aws-cdk-automation aws-cdk-automation dismissed their stale review December 19, 2024 12:48

✅ Updated pull request passes all PRLinter validations. Dismissing previous PRLinter review.

@aws-cdk-automation aws-cdk-automation removed the pr/needs-cli-test-run This PR needs CLI tests run against it. label Dec 19, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 19, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 78.86%. Comparing base (57bba19) to head (b511062).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main   #32573   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   78.86%   78.86%           
=======================================
  Files         108      108           
  Lines        7165     7165           
  Branches     1319     1319           
=======================================
  Hits         5651     5651           
  Misses       1330     1330           
  Partials      184      184           
Flag Coverage Δ
suite.unit 78.86% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Components Coverage Δ
packages/aws-cdk 78.86% <ø> (ø)

Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Dec 19, 2024

Thank you for contributing! Your pull request will be updated from main and then merged automatically (do not update manually, and be sure to allow changes to be pushed to your fork).

@aws-cdk-automation
Copy link
Collaborator

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

  • CodeBuild project: AutoBuildv2Project1C6BFA3F-wQm2hXv2jqQv
  • Commit ID: b511062
  • Result: SUCCEEDED
  • Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

@mergify mergify bot merged commit e867b94 into main Dec 19, 2024
16 of 17 checks passed
Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Dec 19, 2024

Thank you for contributing! Your pull request will be updated from main and then merged automatically (do not update manually, and be sure to allow changes to be pushed to your fork).

@mergify mergify bot deleted the huijbers/eslint branch December 19, 2024 17:43
Copy link

Comments on closed issues and PRs are hard for our team to see.
If you need help, please open a new issue that references this one.

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Dec 19, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
contribution/core This is a PR that came from AWS. p2 pr-linter/cli-integ-tested Assert that any CLI changes have been integ tested
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants