Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(cli): requiresRefresh function does not respect null #32666

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jan 7, 2025
Merged

Conversation

kaizencc
Copy link
Contributor

@kaizencc kaizencc commented Dec 27, 2024

This function should also respect expiration: null, I think, but also I don't believe this fixes the ultimate issue of #32653. Just a guess at this point.

The function docs are as follows:

@param requiresRefresh
A function that will evaluate the resolved value and determine if it represents static value or one that will eventually need to be refreshed. For example, AWS credentials that have no defined expiration will never need to be refreshed, so this function would return true if the credentials resolved by the underlying provider had an expiration and false otherwise.

Since we are respecting null as a valid expiration just like undefined in credentialsAboutToExpire, we should also respect it here.

Underlying memoize function is this one: https://github.com/smithy-lang/smithy-typescript/blob/main/packages/property-provider/src/memoize.ts#L27


By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache-2.0 license

@kaizencc kaizencc requested a review from a team as a code owner December 27, 2024 01:00
@github-actions github-actions bot added the p2 label Dec 27, 2024
@aws-cdk-automation aws-cdk-automation requested a review from a team December 27, 2024 01:00
@mergify mergify bot added the contribution/core This is a PR that came from AWS. label Dec 27, 2024
Copy link
Collaborator

@aws-cdk-automation aws-cdk-automation left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The pull request linter has failed. See the aws-cdk-automation comment below for failure reasons. If you believe this pull request should receive an exemption, please comment and provide a justification.

A comment requesting an exemption should contain the text Exemption Request. Additionally, if clarification is needed add Clarification Request to a comment.

@aws-cdk-automation aws-cdk-automation added the pr/needs-cli-test-run This PR needs CLI tests run against it. label Dec 27, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 27, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 81.37%. Comparing base (946b748) to head (a6f39c7).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main   #32666   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   81.37%   81.37%           
=======================================
  Files         222      222           
  Lines       13693    13693           
  Branches     2412     2412           
=======================================
  Hits        11143    11143           
  Misses       2271     2271           
  Partials      279      279           
Flag Coverage Δ
suite.unit 81.37% <100.00%> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Components Coverage Δ
packages/aws-cdk 80.68% <100.00%> (ø)
packages/aws-cdk-lib/core 82.09% <ø> (ø)

@rix0rrr rix0rrr added the pr/do-not-merge This PR should not be merged at this time. label Dec 27, 2024
@kaizencc kaizencc added pr-linter/exempt-test The PR linter will not require test changes pr-linter/exempt-integ-test The PR linter will not require integ test changes and removed pr/do-not-merge This PR should not be merged at this time. labels Jan 2, 2025
@kaizencc
Copy link
Contributor Author

kaizencc commented Jan 2, 2025

There's no reasonable way to test this in aws-cdk because the thing we want to test is inside memoize, which is a function written in smithy

@kaizencc kaizencc removed the pr/needs-cli-test-run This PR needs CLI tests run against it. label Jan 6, 2025
@aws-cdk-automation aws-cdk-automation added the pr/needs-cli-test-run This PR needs CLI tests run against it. label Jan 6, 2025
@kaizencc kaizencc removed the pr/needs-cli-test-run This PR needs CLI tests run against it. label Jan 6, 2025
@aws-cdk-automation aws-cdk-automation added the pr/needs-cli-test-run This PR needs CLI tests run against it. label Jan 6, 2025
@kaizencc kaizencc added pr-linter/cli-integ-tested Assert that any CLI changes have been integ tested and removed pr/needs-cli-test-run This PR needs CLI tests run against it. labels Jan 7, 2025
@aws-cdk-automation aws-cdk-automation dismissed their stale review January 7, 2025 04:04

✅ Updated pull request passes all PRLinter validations. Dismissing previous PRLinter review.

Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Jan 7, 2025

Thank you for contributing! Your pull request will be updated from main and then merged automatically (do not update manually, and be sure to allow changes to be pushed to your fork).

@aws-cdk-automation
Copy link
Collaborator

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

  • CodeBuild project: AutoBuildv2Project1C6BFA3F-wQm2hXv2jqQv
  • Commit ID: a6f39c7
  • Result: SUCCEEDED
  • Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

@mergify mergify bot merged commit 2abc23c into main Jan 7, 2025
18 of 19 checks passed
Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Jan 7, 2025

Thank you for contributing! Your pull request will be updated from main and then merged automatically (do not update manually, and be sure to allow changes to be pushed to your fork).

@mergify mergify bot deleted the conroy/gettime branch January 7, 2025 04:35
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 7, 2025

Comments on closed issues and PRs are hard for our team to see.
If you need help, please open a new issue that references this one.

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jan 7, 2025
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
contribution/core This is a PR that came from AWS. p2 pr-linter/cli-integ-tested Assert that any CLI changes have been integ tested pr-linter/exempt-integ-test The PR linter will not require integ test changes pr-linter/exempt-test The PR linter will not require test changes
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants