Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix open tunnel bug when NO_PROXY is unset #8039

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 19, 2023

Conversation

hsingh6764
Copy link

#8023

Description of changes:
Allow NO_PROXY to be None. If it is not defined or is empty or None then we don't check.

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that you can use, modify, copy, and redistribute this contribution, under the terms of your choice.

Copy link
Contributor

@kyleknap kyleknap left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good. I just had a few smaller comments and we should be good to merge this.

awscli/customizations/ec2instanceconnect/websocket.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
awscli/customizations/ec2instanceconnect/websocket.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Jul 18, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #8039 (13c9e77) into v2 (8dd9a23) will decrease coverage by 0.02%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##               v2    #8039      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   93.12%   93.11%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         363      363              
  Lines       38288    38288              
  Branches     6126     6126              
==========================================
- Hits        35656    35652       -4     
- Misses       1962     1966       +4     
  Partials      670      670              
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
...cli/customizations/ec2instanceconnect/websocket.py 90.53% <100.00%> (ø)

... and 1 file with indirect coverage changes

Copy link
Contributor

@kyleknap kyleknap left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good! Merging.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants