Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Enhance local mode support for LLM inference without model data #5013

Open
wants to merge 12 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

pranavvm26
Copy link

Issue #, if available:
N/A

Description of changes:
Enhance local mode support for LLM inference without model data

  • Current sagemaker py-sdk local model forces the requirement of model_data param which is not applicable to LLM inference (ex: DJL-LMI, HF-TGI, etc..) which downloads models based on ..MODEL_ID from hubs.
  • Enhanced/updated docker compose structure when instance_type=local_gpu.
devices:                                                                    
   - capabilities:                                                             
     - gpu                                                                     
     count: all                                                                
     driver: nvidia
  • Added test cases for local CPU based training, inference and processing.
  • Added test cases for local GPU based HuggingFace TGI and DJL-LMI inference.

Testing done:

Merge Checklist

Put an x in the boxes that apply. You can also fill these out after creating the PR. If you're unsure about any of them, don't hesitate to ask. We're here to help! This is simply a reminder of what we are going to look for before merging your pull request.

General

  • I have read the CONTRIBUTING doc
  • I certify that the changes I am introducing will be backward compatible, and I have discussed concerns about this, if any, with the Python SDK team
  • I used the commit message format described in CONTRIBUTING
  • I have passed the region in to all S3 and STS clients that I've initialized as part of this change.
  • I have updated any necessary documentation, including READMEs and API docs (if appropriate)

Tests

  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works (if appropriate)
  • I have added unit and/or integration tests as appropriate to ensure backward compatibility of the changes
  • I have checked that my tests are not configured for a specific region or account (if appropriate)
  • I have used unique_name_from_base to create resource names in integ tests (if appropriate)
  • If adding any dependency in requirements.txt files, I have spell checked and ensured they exist in PyPi

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.

@pranavvm26 pranavvm26 requested a review from a team as a code owner February 1, 2025 22:54
@pranavvm26 pranavvm26 requested a review from nileshvd February 1, 2025 22:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant