Skip to content

Add a combined rate provider question to the issue template #415

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
mkflow27 merged 1 commit into from
Jul 21, 2025
Merged

Add a combined rate provider question to the issue template #415

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
1 change: 1 addition & 0 deletions .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/review-request.yml
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ body:
label: Additional Contract Information
description: Additional points clarify the intended usage of the related asset.
options:
- label: Is a combined rate provider needed (i.e. wstETH in aave)?
- label: Does this rate provider pertain to an ERC4626 contract?
- label: If so, is the intention for this ERC4626 asset to be [boosted](https://docs.balancer.fi/concepts/explore-available-balancer-pools/boosted-pool.html#advantages-of-boosted-pools)?
- label: If so, shall the underlying asset be used to add/remove liquidity in a pool if possible? (i.e. add USDC for waUSDC)
Expand Down